New Jersey Turnpike Ditches Tesla Chargers for Universal EV Stations: A Shocking Plot Twist

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority's decision to replace Tesla Supercharger stations with universal EV chargers marks a significant shift in the state's approach to electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. While Tesla's Superchargers have been an integral part of the EV ecosystem, providing reliability and widespread access, the introduction of Applegreen Electric's universal chargers aims to offer more inclusive solutions for all EV drivers. This transition reflects broader trends in the EV industry, where accessibility and universal charging standards are becoming increasingly prioritized. Integration of universal chargers could potentially enhance the convenience of long‑distance travel for drivers using different EV brands. By accommodating various connector types, Applegreen Electric's stations promise to serve a wider range of vehicles, thus fostering greater EV adoption. However, this evolution also comes with challenges and uncertainties. Concerns around the capacity, reliability, and cost‑effectiveness of these new stations compared to Tesla's established network are prevalent. Moreover, how drivers accustomed to Tesla's fast and efficient service will adapt remains to be seen.

The transition away from Tesla Superchargers on the New Jersey Turnpike poses various implications, both economically and socially. Economically, it could affect businesses in the vicinity of the existing Supercharger locations, as reduced foot traffic might impact local revenue. On the flip side, Applegreen Electric's network could stimulate new growth in areas where their stations are strategically placed. For EV drivers, the cost of charging and the availability of speedy and reliable services are at the forefront of considerations, especially given Tesla's previous reputation for lower prices and minimal downtime. In a social context, this change could impact equity in access to EV charging facilities. With Tesla's proven ability to maintain high uptime and rapid charging, drivers—especially those in remote areas or with limited home charging access—have come to rely on these stations. As the shift unfolds, the effectiveness of universally accessible chargers in sustaining this reliability will be crucial in shaping public perception and acceptance.

From a policy standpoint, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's move aligns with broader clean energy and transportation goals but also opens up potential avenues for debate and reconsideration. The Authority's decision, made in a climate of increasing focus on environmental sustainability, shows a commitment to supporting a diversified network of EV users. Nonetheless, the politics surrounding this shift—to remove a well‑functioning system in favor of a relatively untested alternative—may lead to criticisms concerning transparency and decision‑making. Political analysts and stakeholders will be keenly observing how these developments impact the perception of state policies that incentivize EV adoption and clean energy transitions. The decision is likely to set a precedent that could influence other regional transportation authorities and their partnerships with private infrastructure providers.

In light of these changes, it's essential to consider the long‑term implications for New Jersey's commitment to zero‑emission goals. For Tesla, redirecting its focus to off‑Turnpike locations may provide an opportunity to innovate and expand its customer base outside of its traditional footprint. Meanwhile, if Applegreen Electric can deliver on its promises of reliability and universality, it stands to strengthen its position in the EV charging landscape significantly. As the competition between these entities evolves, the outcome will not only determine charging accessibility across New Jersey but also potentially guide future infrastructure projects nationwide. The success or failure of these universal chargers could shape the narrative for adopting similar models across other states, influencing national trends toward sustainable and accessible transportation solutions.

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority’s (NJTA) decision to replace Tesla Supercharger stations with universal electric vehicle (EV) charging stations from Applegreen Electric represents a significant shift in the state’s approach to supporting electric transportation infrastructure. This decision is part of a broader trend towards creating more inclusive charging solutions that accommodate a wider range of EV models beyond Tesla. This transition is expected to occur over several phases, with six service areas slated for the switch by June 6, 2025, followed by others such as Molly Pitcher and Clara Barton in subsequent months. The aim is to expand accessibility to all EV drivers by installing charging stations that are not brand‑specific, in line with a universal open access approach [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

However, this decision has not been without controversy. Tesla, which had been a prominent player in the EV infrastructure landscape with their Supercharger network, found their bid to continue as a secondary charging option on the turnpike was rejected. This rejection resulted in the planned decommissioning of 64 Supercharger stalls located at the turnpike rest stops, a move that has sparked considerable debate among stakeholders and the public alike [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/). Despite this setback, Tesla has strategically responded by developing an additional 116 Supercharger stalls off the turnpike, aiming to serve its customer base and alleviate potential disruptions due to this change [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

The motivations behind this transition were not explicitly detailed in the official announcements. Nonetheless, it appears that a key driving force was the intention to promote broader EV accessibility, ensuring that charging infrastructure supports all types of vehicles rather than being dominated by a single brand. This approach aligns with ongoing discussions about the future of transportation infrastructure, which increasingly recognizes the need for inclusivity and interoperability among different vehicle types and charging station models [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

The shift to Applegreen Electric's universal charging stations reflects an evolving EV ecosystem where charging access is no longer limited to a particular manufacturer. It signals a move toward fostering a competitive environment that could drive improvements in service and reduce costs for consumers. However, the decision also brings with it challenges and uncertainties, particularly concerning the reliability and cost‑effectiveness of the new systems compared to Tesla's established network known for its efficiency [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/). Stakeholders are closely watching the implementation to see if it will deliver the expected benefits or if it will face hurdles that could impact the state’s ambitious goals for emissions reductions and clean energy adoption.

The transition timeline for the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's integration of universal EV charging stations marks a significant shift in the region's infrastructure. Beginning with six service areas that are set to transition by June 6, 2025, the ambitious rollout plan highlights the state's commitment to providing open access to a broader range of electric vehicle drivers. This initial phase will set the stage for subsequent changes, with the Molly Pitcher service area poised to adopt the new universal chargers by July. By the fall of 2025, both the Clara Barton and John Fenwick service areas are expected to complete their transitions, underlining a concerted effort to revamp charging availability across major transport routes. Details of the rollout suggest a strategic approach to minimize disruption while enhancing the state's infrastructure sustainability.

As this transition unfolds, key dates become pivotal markers in the calendar of changes affecting electric vehicle users. June 6, 2025, serves as the cornerstone for this transformation, with the first batch of service areas set to complete their shift to Applegreen Electric's universal charging stations. Following closely, the July transition of Molly Pitcher reinforces the authority's commitment to maintaining momentum and pace, easing the switch for drivers. The anticipated fall transition for Clara Barton and John Fenwick points towards a phased approach designed to minimize inconvenience while expanding access. The strategic timeline ensures a coherent rollout that aligns with New Jersey's broader clean energy goals. This timeline provides clarity for stakeholders and users alike, signaling significant enhancements in EV accessibility and infrastructure development.

The removal of Tesla Superchargers on the New Jersey Turnpike marks a significant shift in the state's approach to EV infrastructure, emphasizing the installation of universal charging stations by Applegreen Electric. This change, aimed at creating a more inclusive charging environment for all electric vehicle (EV) users, means decommissioning 64 Tesla Supercharger stalls. By doing so, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) eliminates a critical charging resource renowned for its dependability, often achieving a 99.9% uptime and minimal wait times even during peak hours. The move to replace these proprietary chargers with universal ones could potentially democratize charging access, yet also risks alienating Tesla drivers who have become accustomed to their brand's specific network and service efficiency. More on these developments can be found [here](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Tesla's strategic response involves constructing 116 new Supercharger stalls off the Turnpike, endeavoring to mitigate the impact on their drivers and maintain charging convenience. Despite losing a bid to remain a secondary charging option on the Turnpike, Tesla appears committed to preserving its service standards by establishing alternative stations. While this ensures continuous support for Tesla drivers, the transition raises questions about whether these new stations will match the accessibility and convenience provided by those within the Turnpike's rest areas. This development is detailed further in Tesla's public communications, such as tweets outlining the new Supercharger locations [here](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/1928498999549637029).

The broader EV landscape is influenced by these changes, particularly as more automakers adopt Tesla's NACS connector, positioning it as a potential standard for unified EV charging solutions across North America. This potential standardization highlights the tension between existing proprietary networks and emerging universal solutions. The transition might catalyze a shift in charging infrastructure strategy for states and regions aiming to enhance EV adoption and simplify the user experience. Within this context, New Jersey's decision reflects ongoing adjustments and recalibrations in the EV sector. This strategic realignment, as analyzed by The Verge, suggests a possible pivot towards more inclusive but challenging transitions in charging infrastructure [link](https://www.theverge.com/23758095/electric‑vehicle‑charging‑news‑nacs‑ccs‑tesla‑supercharger‑us‑infrastructure).

Moreover, the decision to transition away from Tesla‑exclusive infrastructure may reflect a broader trend towards universal 'Plug and Charge' protocols anticipated to simplify charging transactions by 2025. Such initiatives are expected to streamline the user experience by eliminating proprietary barriers, thereby facilitating a seamless integration of different EV models across various networks. However, this shift's success will closely depend on the reliability and cost‑effectiveness of the new Applegreen Electric chargers which aim to replace Tesla's superior infrastructure. These ongoing developments and related discussions are further elaborated in expert analyses, such as reports on Rethinking Equity in Electric Vehicle Infrastructure by Rice University [link](https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/rethinking‑equity‑electric‑vehicle‑infrastructure).

This evolving situation presents both challenges and opportunities for New Jersey's EV infrastructure strategy. On one hand, Tesla's expansion of its network off the Turnpike provides a crucial buffer, potentially alleviating some of the friction caused by the NJTA's decision. On the other hand, Applegreen Electric’s ability to deliver competitive charging speeds and costs will determine the transition's ultimate efficacy and user acceptance. As the state ventures into this new charging paradigm, industry observers will keenly watch for any signs of consumer dissatisfaction that could shape future policy directions. Concrete evaluations of this policy shift can be seen in the NJTA’s public announcements [source](https://evchargingstations.com/chargingnews/the‑new‑jersey‑turnpike‑authority‑requests‑removal‑of‑tesla‑superchargers/).

The transition to universal electric vehicle (EV) chargers is driven by various factors, not explicitly detailed in the current discourse around the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's decision. It's plausible that the move aims to enhance accessibility for drivers of different EV brands, providing them with open and equal charging opportunities. Such inclusivity aligns with broadening efforts to promote EV adoption across diverse consumer segments. Moreover, this initiative could be part of strategic partnerships, like the one with Applegreen Electric, to enhance the infrastructure's capacity and reliability. For further information, the detailed reasoning behind this shift can be explored more comprehensively through this [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

With the rise in electric vehicle usage, there is a pressing need to make charging stations more universal and accessible. Replacing proprietary charging systems with universal chargers can provide a more cohesive network that caters to all electric vehicles, thus encouraging broader EV adoption. This shift may also simplify logistics and operational management for services like the New Jersey Turnpike, as universal chargers can accommodate any brand without necessitating separate installations for different makes. This decision may help streamline operations and reflect a forward‑thinking approach to EV infrastructure development. To gain more insight into the transition dynamics, refer to [this article](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Another possible reason for moving toward universal EV chargers is the anticipated economic benefit. By broadening the charging availability to all electric vehicles, rather than catering to a single brand, there could be a consequent increase in traffic through charging stations, thereby generating more economic activity around these sites. Furthermore, diversifying the charging infrastructure away from a single provider like Tesla could help mitigate issues related to monopolistic practices, promoting a healthier competitive environment among charging providers. Details about these economic perspectives are further elaborated [here](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Additionally, the shift to universal chargers is a reflection of evolving industry standards and consumer expectations. As more automotive manufacturers pivot towards producing electric vehicles, there's an emerging consensus around harmonizing the charging infrastructure to facilitate easier and more seamless user experiences. The notion of universal chargers supports this evolution by ensuring that all EVs, regardless of make, have equitable access to essential infrastructure. This inclusive approach is also seen as a critical step toward the broader adoption of electric vehicles globally. Broader implications of this industry evolution are discussed in depth in [this document](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority's decision to transition from Tesla Superchargers to universal EV charging stations from Applegreen Electric has sparked a variety of expert opinions. While some experts express concerns over potential negative impacts on reliability and cost‑efficiency, others perceive this shift as an opportunity for broader EV adoption and economic growth. Critics of the move emphasize the high operational standards set by Tesla Superchargers, which boast impressive reliability metrics and competitive pricing. They argue that replacing these stations with a single provider like Applegreen Electric could compromise service quality and escalate costs, noting Tesla's proven track record for maintaining low prices and minimal wait times [source](https://evxl.co/2025/05/30/njta‑replaces‑tesla‑superchargers‑with‑third‑party‑provider/).

On the other hand, some experts see a silver lining in the adoption of universal charging stations that cater to a wider range of electric vehicles. This integration aligns with a vision of unified charging infrastructure that could spur broader EV adoption across different car brands [source](https://www.theverge.com/23758095/electric‑vehicle‑charging‑news‑nacs‑ccs‑tesla‑supercharger‑us‑infrastructure). As Tesla opens its network to other electric vehicle models, the resulting increase in charging options may enhance convenience and encourage more people to transition from traditional vehicles to EVs. Proponents also highlight potential economic benefits, suggesting that increased traffic to these universal stations might stimulate local economies near the new charging facilities [source](https://opentools.ai/news/tesla‑faces‑supercharger‑setback‑64‑stations‑to‑be‑decommissioned‑on‑new‑jersey‑turnpike).

Despite differing viewpoints, there's an agreement that the transition's success depends heavily on Applegreen Electric's ability to deliver consistent, reliable service that meets or exceeds current expectations. The long‑term implications of this move remain to be seen, as it will undoubtedly influence customer satisfaction and the pace of EV adoption within New Jersey. The strategic partnership could set a precedent for other regions looking to expand their charging infrastructures, potentially presenting a model for achieving seamless, multi‑brand support across the EV spectrum. However, should Applegreen fail to deliver, it could reinforce established players like Tesla as the benchmark for effectiveness and accessibility in the charging network industry, reminding stakeholders of the critical importance of reliable service delivery [source](https://evxl.co/2025/05/30/njta‑replaces‑tesla‑superchargers‑with‑third‑party‑provider/).

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority’s decision to replace Tesla Supercharger stations with universal EV chargers from Applegreen Electric has sparked a significant wave of reactions across various social media platforms. Many users on X (formerly Twitter) have expressed their dissatisfaction, focusing on the removal of what they perceived as a reliable and fast‑charging solution. Tesla, known for its expansive and efficient Supercharger network, had become the preferred choice for many EV drivers, and its replacement by a less familiar entity has led to a flurry of critical comments online. The reactions range from displeasure about potential increased waiting times at charging stations to concerns over Applegreen’s ability to offer a competitive level of service.

Social media has played a crucial role in voicing public criticism regarding the transition. Many commentators speculate about the motivations behind the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's actions, with some attributing the decision to political influences or allegations of corruption, as highlighted by certain observers quoting Tesla founder Elon Musk’s comments on.¹ This backdrop of suspicion has fueled further debate about the objectivity and transparency of the NJTA’s decision‑making process. Users have discussed the potential repercussions this decision may have, not only for Tesla but for EV adoption in New Jersey as a whole.

Further discussions on public forums reflect concerns about the practical implications of this change, with numerous participants questioning the strategic sense behind removing Tesla’s high‑use stations. There is a palpable fear that the move could create charging bottlenecks, increasing wait times and reducing efficiency for drivers accustomed to the seamless service previously offered by Tesla. This has led to widespread dissatisfaction among EV owners, as echoed in discussions on platforms like Reddit and dedicated EV community sites.

The overarching sentiment within public discourse is one of apprehension and criticism. Many see the NJTA's decision as potentially undermining the broader goals of promoting EV adoption and achieving New Jersey's clean energy targets. Concerns about accessibility and affordability have surfaced, with critics arguing that a move away from Tesla’s proven infrastructure may hinder progress and harm consumer confidence in public EV charging facilities. As discussions continue, it remains clear that the decision has ignited intense debate and cast a spotlight on the evolving landscape of EV infrastructure.

Overall, the shift from Tesla’s Superchargers to Applegreen’s universal chargers serves as a focal point for broader conversations about equity and accessibility in EV infrastructure. It underscores persistent challenges within the transition to electric mobility, as well as the balancing of corporate interests and public policy objectives. With public opinion largely critical, the situation exemplifies the complexities and contentious nature inherent in such transformative infrastructural decisions.

The decision by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority to replace Tesla Supercharger stations with universal EV charging stations from Applegreen Electric signifies a critical juncture in the state's approach to electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. Economically, the move could lead to increased charging costs for consumers due to diminished competition, as the Tesla Superchargers reportedly provided cheaper per kilowatt‑hour rates than other providers. This shift could potentially slow the rate of EV adoption by cost‑conscious consumers—an outcome that contrasts with New Jersey's commitment to achieving 100% zero‑emission vehicle sales by 2035. Additionally, the economic impact extends to local businesses previously benefiting from traffic at Tesla's Supercharger sites. However, there may be a silver lining as Tesla aims to mitigate these changes by establishing 116 new off‑Turnpike Supercharger stalls, potentially offsetting economic losses and shifting business traffic [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Socially, the change raises significant concerns regarding accessibility and equity. The removal of directly Turnpike‑accessible Tesla Superchargers could lead to increased congestion at remaining stations and extend wait times, particularly affecting those who rely on the Turnpike for long‑distance travel. Such inconvenience could disproportionately burden Tesla drivers without access to home charging solutions. While Tesla's new Supercharger installations off the Turnpike attempt to alleviate these issues, the comprehensive accessibility and convenience of charging on the road might be compromised. Although the transition to universal chargers can seemingly enhance accessibility for other EV brands, the effectiveness of this improvement relies heavily on Applegreen Electric's network performance [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Politically, the NJTA’s decision has sparked substantial controversy and public criticism, highlighting tensions between governmental commitments to clean energy and corporate interests. Accusations of political bias and corruption have surfaced, with public sentiment largely critical of how the decision aligns with New Jersey's clean energy objectives. There is a palpable tension as the decision may influence not only public‑private partnerships within the state but also set precedents in EV infrastructure policy for other states. The backlash could compel legislative reconsiderations or catalyze adjustments in state policies concerning regulatory oversight and infrastructure investments, further complicating the political landscape surrounding sustainable transportation initiatives. The NJTA and state officials might face mounting pressure to justify or reconsider their decision in light of these multifaceted implications [source](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

The decision by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) to switch from Tesla Superchargers to universal EV chargers from Applegreen Electric has profound implications for the state's electric vehicle (EV) landscape. This move marks a pivotal shift aimed at creating a more inclusive charging infrastructure that potentially benefits all EV drivers. As universal access becomes the norm, it's expected to attract a broader range of EV users. However, this transition is not without its challenges, particularly when comparing the established reliability and cost‑effectiveness of Tesla's infrastructure [1](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Tesla's current Superchargers are renowned for their high uptime and efficiency, offering significant advantages in terms of reduced wait times and lower charging costs. With Applegreen taking over, concerns have arisen regarding whether they can match these performance standards, which could potentially affect the adoption rate of electric vehicles in New Jersey. The state's ambitious goal of achieving 100% zero‑emission new car sales by 2035 might be hindered if the transition fails to meet user expectations [6](https://evxl.co/2025/05/30/njta‑replaces‑tesla‑superchargers‑with‑third‑party‑provider/).

Moreover, the NJTA’s decision could have broader economic and political impacts. Economically, the shift to a single provider could lead to higher costs for consumers due to reduced competition, possibly deterring new EV buyers. Politically, the move has sparked controversy and public backlash, with accusations of political bias surfacing, complicating the state's clean energy narrative [5](https://opentools.ai/news/tesla‑faces‑supercharger‑setback‑64‑stations‑to‑be‑decommissioned‑on‑new‑jersey‑turnpike). This decision not only highlights the tension between state goals and corporate influence but also sets a precedent for other regions considering similar transitions.

The departure of Tesla Superchargers from the turnpike highlights a strategic opening for other charging networks. Tesla's proactive measures to install Superchargers off the turnpike indicate a strategic resilience, ensuring that its customers continue to have accessible options. As New Jersey navigates this transition, the long‑term consequences will hinge on Applegreen Electric's ability to deliver a network that rivals or exceeds the standards set by Tesla, potentially influencing EV infrastructure strategies nationwide [7](https://evxl.co/2025/05/30/njta‑replaces‑tesla‑superchargers‑with‑third‑party‑provider/).

In conclusion, the decision by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority to replace Tesla Supercharger stations with Applegreen Electric's universal EV charging stations marks a significant shift in the region's electrification strategy. The move, as noted in the news article from 6abc, not only reflects an evolutionary change in EV infrastructure but also poses various economic, social, and political implications. This strategic pivot is anticipated to streamline charging operations and potentially foster broader EV adoption, despite public and expert concerns about reliability and cost‑effectiveness [1](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

The transition away from Tesla's dedicated network towards a more universally accessible charging solution underlines the growing need for inclusivity in EV infrastructure. However, questions remain about whether the new charging stations will meet the high standards set by Tesla's Superchargers in terms of uptime and affordability. As the transition progresses, ongoing evaluations will be necessary to ensure that the new infrastructure can support New Jersey's ambitious clean energy goals and continue to encourage EV adoption both in and out of state [1](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

Ultimately, the decision could serve as a pivotal case study on the impact of infrastructure changes on consumer behavior and energy policy. While Tesla has settled into an alternative strategy by building offline Supercharger stations, the effectiveness of these solutions in replacing the convenience and reliability of on‑turnpike Superchargers remains to be seen. This move, though controversial, might pave the way for future infrastructure developments if Applegreen Electric's network proves successful [1](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

For the state's policymakers, the coming years will be crucial in assessing whether this approach yields the desired outcomes without alienating existing Tesla clientele. Engaging with stakeholders across different EV brands could facilitate a smoother transition and avoid potential market disruptions. The integration of a more universal charging network further emphasizes the broader transition in the EV industry towards an inclusive electric ecosystem [1](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).

In summary, while the initial controversy surrounding the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's decision underscores the uncertainty in its immediate implications, it also highlights the evolving landscape of the EV industry. The successful adaptation and performance of Applegreen Electric's infrastructure could eventually represent a unified model for EV charging, benefiting a wider spectrum of electric vehicle users and helping the state to achieve its environmental goals [1](https://6abc.com/post/new‑jersey‑turnpike‑switching‑ev‑charging‑stations‑dropping‑tesla/16631306/).