Updated Jun 18

Share this article

More on This Story

Bay Area Tech Layoffs Hit 9,284 in 2026, Already Topping H1 2025

Jun 14, 2026

Bay Area Tech Layoffs Hit 9,284 in 2026, Already Topping H1 2025

Bay Area tech companies have cut 9,284 jobs so far in 2026, already surpassing the roughly 4,700 cuts from the first half of 2025. The latest wave includes 370 positions across ServiceNow, Salesforce, Ubisoft, Quizlet, and Verily Health.

bay-area-tech-layoffsservicenowsalesforce

Meta Engineers Call AI Unit a ‘Gulag’ as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes

Jun 14, 2026

Meta Engineers Call AI Unit a ‘Gulag’ as Zuckerberg Admits Mistakes

Meta funneled 6,500 engineers into a new Applied AI unit three months ago. Now workers call it 'the gulag,' a livestream was hijacked by a furious employee, and Mark Zuckerberg is in damage-control mode, admitting the company made mistakes and ruling out more layoffs for 2026.

meta-aiapplied-ai-unitai-workforce

AI Drives 40% of US Job Cuts in May as 97,000 Positions Eliminated

Jun 9, 2026

AI Drives 40% of US Job Cuts in May as 97,000 Positions Eliminated

AI was cited as the primary reason for 40% of all US job cuts in May 2026, according to the Challenger Report, with 97,006 positions eliminated overall. A separate Mercer survey found 99% of CEOs expect AI-driven layoffs within two years, as the technology sector alone shed 38,242 jobs — the highest monthly total since August 2024.

ai-job-cuts-2026ai-layoffschallenger-report

SAG-AFTRA and Women’s Groups Rally for AI Safety Bill Approval

California's AI Legislation Battle Heats Up

SAG-AFTRA and Women’s Groups Rally for AI Safety Bill Approval

SAG‑AFTRA, the National Organization for Women, and Fund Her are urging California Governor Gavin Newsom to sign the AI safety bill SB 1047. The bill, which has stirred intense debate and unusual political alliances, aims to establish civil liability for AI developers and protect against potential AI‑driven catastrophes.

SAG‑AFTRA, the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Fund Her are urging California Governor Gavin Newsom to sign SB 1047, a crucial AI safety bill. These organizations emphasize the potentially catastrophic harm AI could cause if left unregulated, highlighting issues such as cyberattacks and bioweapon development.

SAG‑AFTRA, representing 160,000 performers, including stars like Scarlett Johansson and Tom Hanks, posted a call for support, stressing that AI regulation is vital to protect their members' livelihoods from nonconsensual digital replicas and deepfake pornography. NOW's support is driven by concerns that unregulated AI could disproportionately impact vulnerable groups, especially women.

Authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, SB 1047 seeks to establish civil liability for developers of advanced AI like ChatGPT if they cause disasters without appropriate safeguards. It also includes whistleblower protections, gaining support from notable AI whistleblowers like Daniel Kokotajlo and William Saunders. The bill has passed both houses of California's state legislature and awaits Newsom's decision by September 30th.

This bill has garnered exceptional national attention, disrupting traditional partisan alignments. High‑profile endorsements include Elon Musk and social justice groups, while influential figures like Nancy Pelosi and Ro Khanna, as well as venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and AI scientist Fei‑Fei Li, oppose it. This unusual array of supporters and detractors underscores the complexity and high stakes of the AI regulatory debate.

Supporters argue that California's pioneering stance on AI regulation, much like its historical impact with auto emissions laws, will set a global precedent. Dan Hendrycks, director of the Center for AI Safety, likens Newsom's potential signing of SB 1047 to former Governor Pat Brown's landmark environmental legislation, coined as the 'California Effect.'

Conversely, major tech companies such as Google, Meta, and OpenAI, alongside prominent investors like Y Combinator and Andreessen Horowitz, fiercely oppose the bill. They argue that stringent regulations could lead to an exodus of AI talent from California, ceded leadership to countries like China, and detrimental effects on the open‑source community.

Despite industry resistance, advocates like Dario Amodei, CEO of AI company Anthropic, view threats to relocate as theatrics. Anthropic, a surprising supporter after amendments addressed their concerns, maintains the benefits of SB 1047 outweigh potential costs. With key federal leaders against substantial AI regulation, California may pioneer independent AI governance, echoing its actions on net neutrality and data privacy.

Given his history of making thoughtful decisions, Governor Newsom's stance on SB 1047 could significantly influence AI governance both within the state and globally. As the September 30th deadline looms, the anticipation surrounding Newsom's decision highlights the critical juncture at which AI regulation stands.