Weekly News Roundup: Test Your Smarts with Our Quiz!

Introduction to the Week's Major News Events

This week's news was dominated by significant events both at home and abroad, offering a complex tapestry of political, social, and economic implications. Domestically, President Trump's decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against ICE raids stirred a hornet's nest of controversy. Public reactions have been deeply divided, highlighting the ongoing polarization in American society. Experts like Hina Shamsi from the ACLU have criticized the move as a dangerous overreach of executive power that could undermine civilian oversight of the military.

Internationally, the crash of an Air India flight in Ahmedabad claimed 242 lives, marking a tragic milestone as the first fatal accident involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The incident has raised questions and speculation about airline safety and pilot error, though experts warn against drawing premature conclusions. As aviation analysts point out, understanding such tragedies requires meticulous investigation akin to an archaeological dig. This tragic event is likely to impact travel patterns and raise safety concerns.

In the realm of health, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s drastic action of dismissing the entire CDC vaccine advisory panel has sparked outrage. The decision, criticized as politically motivated, threatens the integrity of evidence-based health policies, stirring fears about the future of public health responses. Health experts are vocal in their concerns about political interference, underscoring the need for science-driven decision-making.

The U.S.-China trade talks, which resumed with discussions spanning tariffs to rare-earth mineral restrictions, have drawn global attention, considering their potential impacts on markets worldwide. These negotiations are crucial, as they not only affect bilateral relations but also hold broader ramifications for international trade and economic stability.

Elon Musk's apology to President Trump adds another layer to the week's events, possibly reflecting a strategic move to safeguard business interests and government contracts. This action, alongside the legal and political theaters involving figures like Jair Bolsonaro, who is under scrutiny for coup allegations, illustrates the interconnectedness of global politics in this week's news. These stories highlight the fragility of democratic institutions and the intricate dance of influence and power in today's geopolitical climate.

President Trump Deploys Troops to Los Angeles Amid Protests

In the face of widespread protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles, President Trump made the contentious decision to deploy troops to the city. This deployment was part of a broader response to manage the escalating tensions surrounding the raids [1](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/). The decision has drawn significant criticism from various corners of society, portraying it as a drastic measure that undermines civil liberties and escalates rather than resolves the situation.

The deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles has been perceived by many as a response that shifts the focus away from addressing the root causes of the protests, which are rooted in opposition to ICE's aggressive immigration enforcement tactics [1](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/). Critics argue that involving the military in domestic affairs sets a dangerous precedent and reflects an overreach of executive power, raising concerns about the potential erosion of democratic norms.

Public reaction to the deployment has been sharply divided, with Trump supporters viewing it as a necessary step to restore order amidst violent protests, while opponents believe it exacerbates tensions and violates the principles of peaceful protest [1](https://www.masslive.com/news/2025/06/poll-reveals-how-americans-feel-about-trump-sending-troops-into-la-over-ice-protests.html). The move has prompted legal challenges and sparked a nationwide debate on the balance between national security and individual rights.

The protests, initially spurred by ICE raids, quickly escalated to encompass broader issues of immigration policy and human rights, drawing attention through both domestic and international media coverage [1](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/12/which-us-cities-have-the-la-immigration-protests-spread-to). The presence of troops on the streets of Los Angeles has made these protests a focal point for wider discussions on federal authority and the militarization of civilian spaces.

In the weeks following the troop deployment, Los Angeles became a symbol of the national divide over immigration policies and governmental responses to public dissent. The city, which is no stranger to activism and civil unrest, found itself at the center of a contentious national dialogue that questioned the appropriateness and motives behind the federal government's use of military force in domestic issues [1](https://www.npr.org/2025/06/09/nx-s1-5427168/los-angeles-national-guard-trump-legal-question).

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Dismisses Vaccine Advisory Committee

In a sudden and unexpected move, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has dismissed all the members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, sparking a wave of criticism from the scientific community. The decision to retire all 17 members of the committee has been seen by many as a political maneuver rather than a scientifically grounded decision. This action has raised concerns about the future of evidence-based policy-making in public health, especially in matters as crucial as vaccine advisory and immunization practices. Experts, like Michael Osterholm, have voiced their worry that this decision places politics above science, potentially undermining public trust in vaccine initiatives. The abrupt nature of these dismissals has left many questioning the motivations behind such a sweeping change [source].

The firing of the vaccine advisory committee has also ignited a broader debate about the role of governmental influence in scientific decision-making. Critics argue that Kennedy's move could have far-reaching implications for public health, particularly how vaccine policies are developed and implemented. The committee has historically played a critical role in assessing vaccine safety and efficacy—a responsibility now left in limbo due to the lack of a functional advisory body. Public health officials fear that this could slow down the response to emerging health threats and diminish public confidence in vaccination programs. This controversial decision has made headlines, not only questioning its timing but also its impact on future policy decisions [source].

Violence Erupts at Anti-ICE Protest in Las Vegas

The recent anti-ICE protest in Las Vegas turned violent, highlighting the tensions surrounding U.S. immigration policies and enforcement actions. This particular protest was part of a larger wave of demonstrations against ICE raids, similar to those in Los Angeles where President Trump controversially deployed National Guard troops to quell dissent . In Las Vegas, what began as a peaceful assembly quickly escalated into confrontations with law enforcement officials, ultimately leading to multiple arrests. This incident underscores the ongoing national debate about immigration enforcement and civil liberties.

The clash in Las Vegas served as a microcosm of the national unrest surrounding ICE's aggressive immigration operations. Public discourse has been polarized, with significant portions of the population viewing the raids as necessary for national security, while others perceive them as draconian measures that infringe upon human rights. The violent turn of events at the Las Vegas protest, however, reiterates the urgent need for a balanced dialogue between ensuring security and protecting the rights to peaceful protest .

As demonstrators clashed with police, concerns about excessive use of force surfaced, sparking widespread debate on social media and various platforms about the fine line between maintaining public order and suppressing dissent. Some participants and witnesses blamed the police for escalating the situation, arguing that the heavy-handed tactics used were disproportionate to the peaceful intentions of the majority of the protestors . This incident has prompted calls from civil rights organizations for investigations into the police response and a re-evaluation of protest management strategies.

The arrests made at the Las Vegas protest also shed light on the broader implications of the backlash against ICE activities in various U.S. cities. With 94 confirmed arrests during the protest in Las Vegas , questions regarding unlawful assembly and the freedom of expression have been magnified. Civil liberties groups have expressed alarm over the treatment of protestors and have warned against the potential stifling of dissent through intimidation and militarized responses. This incident reflects the deepening divide on immigration policies within American society, urging a reconsideration of methods used by law enforcement during such public demonstrations.

Air India Flight Crash in Ahmedabad: Tragedy and Investigation

In June 2025, a tragic event unfolded as Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The accident, which claimed the lives of 241 passengers and crew members, marked a harrowing first for the Dreamliner model, widely known for its advanced technology and safety features. This calamity shattered many families and left a nation in mourning, highlighting the relentless risks associated with air travel. The heartbreak extended globally, as echoed in the news coverage of the week, capturing the profound impact and the widespread speculation about the causes behind the disaster.

The investigation into the crash of Air India Flight AI171 quickly became the focus of international attention. Aviation experts and authorities embarked on an exhaustive search for answers, treating the wreckage like an archaeological site where every piece of debris could provide pivotal insights. An aviation expert, interviewed about the implications of speculating at such an early stage, called for patience as the investigation unfolded, advocating for a thorough exploration before drawing conclusions—advice aimed at curbing the rampant speculation spreading online. The investigation's complexity mirrored the numerous unrelated aviation incidents raised during the week's major global news stories.

Public reaction to the Air India crash was mixed, reflecting a blend of sorrow and frustration. Many observers, especially those outside India, turned to social media and online forums, seeking instant explanations in a landscape often rife with misinformation. An aviation expert's repeated calls to await official findings resonated deeply as investigative teams worked painstakingly, attempting to reconstruct the flight's final moments. This methodical approach was deemed crucial to prevent premature and potentially misleading speculation, sentiments shared in ongoing discussions about the event on Las Vegas Sun and other news platforms.

The crash not only reignited fears about aviation safety but also placed Air India under the microscope, raising questions about the airline's operational protocols and the aircraft's maintenance records. Such inquiries are standard procedure but can significantly impact public confidence and a company's reputation. The focus on Air India mirrored the broader scrutiny of safety regulations and practices within the aviation industry globally, discussions that were as volatile and varied as those surrounding geopolitical tensions or health crises highlighted in international news.

Russia-Ukraine War: Ukrainian Reports of Russian Casualties

Ukrainian officials have made a staggering assertion that the ongoing war with Russia has resulted in over one million Russian casualties. This claim, while dramatic, underscores the profound human toll of the conflict, raising questions about the war's trajectory and potential resolutions. The figure has been met with skepticism by some analysts, who point out the logistical and corroborative challenges in verifying such numbers in an ongoing and chaotic conflict. However, Ukraine's determination to highlight these statistics underscores its efforts to galvanize international support and maintain pressure on Russia amidst a protracted and grueling battle. For a detailed narrative on contemporary international conflicts, you can refer to this weekly news quiz.

The sheer scale of reported Russian casualties in Ukraine points to a brutal and costly engagement, largely characterized by attritional warfare tactics and a fierce Ukrainian defense strategy. Military analysts attribute these high numbers to strategic missteps, such as ineffective operational coordination and underestimating Ukrainian resilience and capability. Additionally, Ukraine's strategic use of technology and its tactical innovations have played a critical role in inflicting significant losses on Russian forces. This ongoing narrative is not just about military statistics but also about how these figures influence geopolitical dynamics and military strategies worldwide. More on similar topics can be explored through this weekly news quiz shared in a broader context. Experts and analysts, including those at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), see these casualty figures as reflective of a larger strategic misalignment within Russian military strategy, heavily reliant on sheer numbers rather than calculated maneuvers. This attritional approach has not only led to staggering losses but has also ignited a broader dialogue on the sustainability of such military strategies in the modern age of warfare. The war's impact is further explored in various analytical pieces provided through the weekly news review.

Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Contaminated Eggs in Southern Nevada

A recent salmonella outbreak has been traced back to contaminated eggs in Southern Nevada, raising significant public health concerns. According to local health officials, the outbreak has already affected numerous individuals, prompting a swift response from public health agencies. The Southern Nevada Health District has stepped up efforts to educate the public on the risks of consuming raw or undercooked eggs and has provided guidance on safe food handling practices. The outbreak highlights the critical need for food safety vigilance and adherence to best practices to prevent the spread of foodborne illnesses. More information on the outbreak can be found here.

The discovery of salmonella in eggs from Southern Nevada has led to a regional alert, with authorities warning consumers to be cautious. This incident underscores the importance of regulatory oversight and regular inspections in the food industry to ensure public safety. Contaminated food products, such as these eggs, can quickly become a public health issue, affecting not just the immediate region but potentially across state lines. This particular outbreak has prompted discussions on the mechanisms of food contamination and the role of public awareness in preventing similar occurrences in the future. You can read more about the health district's response here.

As the investigation into the salmonella outbreak continues, health officials are focusing on identifying the source of the contamination. The complexity of tracing the exact origin of such an outbreak involves inspecting supply chains and monitoring points of egg production and distribution. This thorough investigation process is crucial in preventing further cases and mitigating the current health crisis. In the meantime, the public is advised to cook eggs thoroughly and follow updated safety tips provided by health authorities. For continuous updates and information on food safety regulations, visit the Southern Nevada Health District's official website here.

Elon Musk Apologizes to President Trump for Social Media Posts

In an unexpected turn of events, Elon Musk issued a formal apology to President Trump regarding some previous controversial posts he had made on social media. This move came as a surprise to many, considering Musk’s often vocal and unorthodox approach to communication online. His apology is seen as a gesture aimed at mitigating tensions, especially in light of recent events where political and business landscapes are closely intertwined. Some analysts suggest this apology might be strategically beneficial for Musk’s various business interests that may rely on government contracts and regulatory approvals. You can read more about the context of this development [here](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/).

Reports indicate that the White House has been actively involved in addressing the fallout from Elon Musk's social media activity, possibly facilitating this apology as part of larger diplomatic efforts to smooth over disagreements. Such actions underscore the complex interplay between high-profile individuals and the executive office, revealing how public statements and social media missteps can lead to significant economic and diplomatic ramifications. The need for resolution in this instance might have driven Musk to publicly retract his statements. For more insights into these events, see the detailed coverage [here](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/).

Elon Musk’s apology has sparked mixed reactions across various platforms and within different communities. Some view it as a responsible step towards reconciling professional relationships that may have been strained, while others criticize it as potentially insincere or pragmatic, aimed solely at protecting business interests. This incident highlights the broader implications of social media interactions among influential figures and their potential impact on global political and corporate dynamics. Those interested in the broader implications of this apology can find more details [here](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/).

Jair Bolsonaro's Court Appearance on Alleged Coup Plot

Jair Bolsonaro's recent court appearance marks a critical moment in Brazil's political landscape, as the former president stands trial over allegations of orchestrating a coup following his electoral defeat in 2022. This trial has captured both national and international attention and is seen as a litmus test for Brazil's democracy. Accusations assert that Bolsonaro and his allies discussed ways to disrupt the democratic process to maintain their grip on power [8](https://www.npr.org/2025/06/10/nx-s1-5428548/bolsonaro-brazil-coup-trial).

The courtroom proceedings have been characterized by intense scrutiny as Bolsonaro denies any involvement in coup plotting activities. His defense argues that such allegations are politically motivated, aiming to tarnish his image and dismantle his political base. Nevertheless, the trial has unveiled insights into the internal dynamics of Bolsonaro's administration, where discussions of a coup allegedly took place with startling casualness [8](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/10/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-coup-trial).

The trial's implications extend beyond Brazil's borders, highlighting concerns about the resilience of democratic institutions in the face of populist politics. It reinforces the global conversation about the fragility of democracy, especially in countries with recent histories of political unrest. As Bolsonaro's legal battle unfolds, it remains a focal point for political analysts worldwide [1](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/).

Public reaction to Bolsonaro's court appearance is polarized. Supporters rally behind him, viewing the trial as a witch hunt against a leader who represented their interests. Critics, however, argue that this legal proceeding is essential to holding Bolsonaro accountable and setting a precedent for protecting democratic processes. This division reflects the ongoing political tensions within Brazil and its potential impact on the country's future governance [1](https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/jun/13/test-your-knowledge-of-the-weeks-major-news-events/).

ABC News Fires Terry Moran Over Social Media Controversy

ABC News recently made headlines when it terminated the employment of veteran journalist Terry Moran. The decision followed in the wake of a controversy surrounding Moran's social media activity. Moran, known for his incisive reporting and eloquent commentary, found himself in hot water after making a series of social media posts critical of prominent political figures. His tweets particularly targeted President Trump, igniting significant backlash and drawing internal scrutiny from ABC News executives.

The firing of Terry Moran has sparked a robust debate about journalistic freedom and the responsibilities that come with public-facing roles in media. While some view the decision as an overreaction by ABC News, fearing a chilling effect on free speech among journalists, others argue that the nature of Moran's posts warranted a response. These posts were perceived by some within the network and its viewership as potentially compromising the impartiality expected of a network correspondent.

This incident aligns with broader tensions in the media industry, where journalists' use of social media has increasingly blurred the lines between personal opinion and professional responsibility. Media outlets like ABC News are grappling with how to maintain journalistic integrity in an era where instant communication often precedes deliberation. The situation exemplifies ongoing challenges faced by media organizations as they balance the right to personal expression with maintaining objectivity in reporting.

Public reaction to Moran’s firing is mixed. Supporters argue that ABC News had no choice but to act given the potential risks to its brand and credibility. They point to previous instances where social media posts have jeopardized professional standings and argue that companies must protect their reputations. On the other hand, critics emphasize the importance of allowing journalists the freedom to express their views, suggesting that silencing such voices can undermine public trust in the media. Discussions continue about whether the firing was proportionate and what it means for journalistic practices moving forward.

Resumption of U.S.-China Trade Talks in London

The resumption of U.S.-China trade talks in London marks a critical juncture in international economic relations, as both nations seek to ease ongoing tensions that have significant global ramifications. Held amidst a backdrop of recent geopolitical upheavals, these negotiations are closely watched by market analysts worldwide, given their potential impact on global trade dynamics. Discussions have centered on prevalent issues such as tariffs, the status of semiconductor export controls, and restrictions on rare-earth minerals, all key components affecting technological and infrastructure development worldwide. These talks aim to find a balanced pathway to mitigate the economic friction that has, in recent years, disrupted supply chains and sent ripples throughout global markets .

The location choice for these significant talks, London, symbolizes a neutral ground amidst the complex web of international alliances. By reconvening the negotiations here, both the U.S. and China signal their recognition of the urgency and importance of these discussions to stabilize their bilateral relations. The world watches on, particularly industries that heavily depend on the semiconductor and rare-earth mineral trades, as outcomes from these meetings could drastically alter market forecasts and production strategies in the coming years .

Furthermore, the trade talks underscore a strategic chess game, as both superpowers exchange diplomatic moves amidst wider global tensions. Analysts suggest that successful negotiations could pave the way for increased cooperation on other pressing issues beyond trade, such as climate change and cybersecurity. However, the failure to reach a consensus might exacerbate economic uncertainties and further deepen the divide between these two influential economies, affecting trade partners and economic growth worldwide. Thus, these talks carry with them the weight not only of bilateral resolution but also of setting the stage for future international economic policies .

Public Reactions to the Week's News Events

The week's major news events elicited a wide range of public reactions, highlighting both domestic and international concerns. President Trump's decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles as a response to ICE raid protests sparked significant controversy, with opinions deeply divided along partisan lines. Supporters argued that the military presence was necessary to maintain order and protect public safety, whereas critics saw it as a dangerous overreach of executive power that threatened to undermine civilian oversight of the military. These events have further polarized the public, illustrating the growing divide in American political discourse [1](https://www.masslive.com/news/2025/06/poll-reveals-how-americans-feel-about-trump-sending-troops-into-la-over-ice-protests.html).

Similarly, the firing of the CDC's vaccine advisory panel by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shocked many in the public health community and beyond. His decision sparked outrage and concerns over political interference in scientific matters, which many fear could undermine public trust in vaccination programs. This move has been criticized by experts as weakening the reliance on scientific evidence in public health decisions [2](https://www.statnews.com/2025/06/09/rfk-jr-fires-every-member-of-cdc-vaccine-expert-panel-acip/).

The crash of an Air India flight in Ahmedabad continued to dominate conversations, with widespread speculation about the causes of the tragedy. As aviation experts urged restraint and a thorough investigation, they cautioned against jumping to premature conclusions. The incident, marking the first fatal crash involving this aircraft model, has prompted deep analyses of aviation safety standards [4](https://theconversation.com/speculation-about-the-cause-of-air-india-crash-is-rife-an-aviation-expert-explains-why-its-a-problem-258911).

Internationally, Ukrainian claims of over a million Russian casualties in the ongoing conflict elicited varied responses, from shock and disbelief to focused geopolitical analysis. Many discussions centered around the human cost of war and the broader implications for international relations. Analysts consider these high casualty figures a reflection of strategic failures and the intense human toll of prolonged conflict [5](https://www.newsweek.com/russia-casualties-ukraine-one-million-2083882).

In Las Vegas, violent protests against ICE led to debates over the limits of free speech and the role of law enforcement in such situations. Opinions varied widely, with some holding the police accountable for escalating tensions. This incident highlighted the complex balance between safeguarding the right to protest and preserving public order, a debate that remains at the forefront of societal discourse [3](https://www.ktnv.com/news/anti-ice-protests-in-downtown-las-vegas-turn-into-unlawful-assembly-according-to-metro-police).

Expert Opinions on the Current Events

Amidst the turbulence of current global events, voices from experts are echoing across the media landscape, offering insights and critiques. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, ardently criticized President Trump's decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles, labeling it a 'dangerous abuse of power.' Her concern centers on the erosion of civilian oversight of the military, a fundamental principle in democratic societies. Her statements have stirred discussions across multiple platforms, highlighting the delicate balance between national security and civilian rights. [Read more](https://www.npr.org/2025/06/09/nx-s1-5427168/los-angeles-national-guard-trump-legal-question).

In recent health policy debates, Michael Osterholm has voiced strong disapproval of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s dismissal of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Osterholm claims this act illustrates a troubling shift where political motivations overshadow scientific evidence. This move has sparked a vigorous dialogue among public health communities about the potential implications for future vaccination policies and public health strategies. [Explore further](https://www.statnews.com/2025/06/09/rfk-jr-fires-every-member-of-cdc-vaccine-expert-panel-acip/).

The tragic crash of Air India Flight in Ahmedabad has led aviation experts to urge caution against premature judgments regarding its cause. Drawing parallels to an archaeological excavation, they emphasize the need for a meticulous investigation. This perspective is crucial as it underscores the importance of methodical analyses over conjecture, ensuring safety standards are thoroughly evaluated to prevent future tragedies. [Learn more](https://theconversation.com/speculation-about-the-cause-of-air-india-crash-is-rife-an-aviation-expert-explains-why-its-a-problem-258911).

Amid reports of over one million Russian casualties in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine, analyses by CSIS have attributed such staggering figures to Russia's reliance on attrition warfare and ineffective battlefield coordination. This expert evaluation highlights the significant challenges confronting Russian military strategies while underscoring the resilience and tactical advancements by Ukrainian defenses. [Discover more](https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-battlefield-woes-ukraine).

The relationship between Elon Musk and his social media critique of President Trump has taken a surprising turn, with Musk issuing a public apology. Analysts speculate this move might be designed to safeguard his business ventures and government alliances. The nuanced dynamics between influential figures like Musk and Trump offer a rich landscape for understanding the intersections of technology, politics, and public perception. [Find out more](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-says-he-regrets-some-posts-he-made-about-trump-2025-06-11/).

Future Implications and Potential Outcomes

The trial of Jair Bolsonaro concerning allegations of plotting a coup underscores the delicacy of democratic processes in volatile political environments. The proceedings not only reveal the tension within Brazil's political sphere but also provide broader reflections on how fragile democratic institutions can become under pressure. This case may set a pivotal legal and moral precedent, impacting not only Brazil but influencing international democracy advocates [].