Anti-Trump Reporter CONFRONTS Tucker Carlson, Immediately Gets DESTROYED

Summary

In a heated exchange, an anti-Trump reporter challenges Tucker Carlson on his comments regarding immigration and the Great Replacement Theory. Carlson denies ever making statements about white people being replaced and argues that his concerns are about native-born Americans of all races. He emphasizes that he is not racist but is focused on issues impacting Americans, such as low birth rates and economic conditions. The conversation escalates as Carlson rebuffs accusations of inspiring violence and defends his stance on gun control and free speech. The dialogue touches on broader issues of race, violence, and freedom of expression, underscoring the intense divide in public discourse.

Highlights

• Tucker Carlson refutes claims about endorsing the Great Replacement Theory. 🔄
• He emphasizes concerns for native-born Americans' welfare across racial lines. 🔍
• Carlson decries accusations linking his rhetoric to violence. 🔗
• The discussion touches on sensitive topics like gun control, free speech, and race. 🎙️
• An exchange on anti-fascist actions further complicates the dialogue, showing deep ideological rifts.⚔️

Key Takeaways

• Tucker Carlson firmly denies claims of promoting the 'Great Replacement Theory' and insists his focus is on native-born Americans. ✋
• He argues that his viewpoints are rooted in economic and cultural concerns, not racially charged sentiments. 💼
• The conversation highlights deep divides in media narratives and perspectives on immigration and race. 📰
• Carlson addresses accusations regarding his potential influence on violent acts, categorically rejecting such links. 🚫
• The discourse turns to gun rights and free speech, emphasizing the contentious political climate in the U.S. 🇺🇸

Overview

During a lively confrontation, Tucker Carlson was questioned by an anti-Trump reporter regarding his views on immigration and the controversial Great Replacement Theory. Carlson rebutted claims of having said white populations are being replaced, stating instead that his concerns are demographic and economic, affecting all native-born Americans regardless of race. His arguments centered on the need to stabilize the country's economy and birth rates for a healthier society.

The debate took a sharp turn as the reporter referenced acts of violence allegedly inspired by similar ideas. Carlson firmly distanced himself from any endorsement of such actions, reiterating his focus on policy and cultural improvements. He insisted that misinterpretations of his viewpoints are driven by ideological biases and sloppy journalism, prompting a fiery back-and-forth about media responsibilities and racial discourse.

Conversations expanded into the realms of gun control and free speech, showcasing the starkly divided perspectives that pervade American politics today. Carlson passionately defended individual rights while criticizing the media's role in shaping narratives he views as misunderstood. This discussion underscores the challenges of maintaining dialogue in an era marked by political polarization and media sensationalism.

Chapters

• 00:00 - 05:00: Tucker Carlson Confrontation on Immigration and Replacement Theory The chapter discusses a confrontation involving Tucker Carlson on the topic of immigration and the Great Replacement Theory. A participant in the dialogue questions Tucker about his previous statements on white populations being replaced by non-white immigrants, alleging that this concept has been mentioned on his show numerous times. Tucker Carlson seems to challenge the accuracy of this statement, questioning when he precisely claimed that whites are being replaced.
• 05:00 - 10:00: Discussion on Gun Control and Responsibility for Violence The chapter discusses the contentious topic of gun control and the underlying themes of responsibility associated with violence in America. The speaker emphasizes that their previous statements did not suggest that white Americans are being replaced but rather highlighted the shared concerns of native-born Americans, including African-Americans. With a focus on historical presence, the speaker acknowledges the longstanding lineage of African-American families in the United States, asserting their concerns as equally valid as those of other Americans who have resided in the country for generations.
• 10:00 - 15:00: Interview with Antifa Professor on Free Speech and Violence The chapter starts with a confrontation about truthfulness, indicating a tense environment. The Antifa professor addresses misconceptions head-on, emphasizing their beliefs and stances on various issues related to free speech and potential violence. The discussion involves a deeper concern regarding national leadership priorities, highlighting the moral responsibilities of elected leaders towards their constituents. The professor expresses unease about leaders who prioritize international concerns over their own citizens, arguing that such actions are immoral. This reflects broader concerns about national identity and the perceived displacement of native citizens by newcomers.
• 15:00 - 20:00: Debate on Public Safety and Security Measures The chapter discusses the debate on public safety and security measures, focusing on population growth in the United States. It highlights that the US population is increasing mainly due to immigration, as the birth rate among those born in the country is below replacement levels. The speaker argues that happy people have children and that a functioning economy supports this. The speaker suggests that improving the economy and culture is essential for enabling people who want to have children. Rather than relying heavily on immigration, the speaker believes addressing these fundamental issues is crucial, and rejects the idea that this viewpoint is racially motivated.

Anti-Trump Reporter CONFRONTS Tucker Carlson, Immediately Gets DESTROYED Transcription

• 00:00 - 00:30 hi Tucker thank you so much for your address today um so you talked a little bit about immigration and in the past you've talked about how uh White Australians Americans Europeans are being replaced by non-white immigrants in what is often referred to as the great replacement Theory this is the same have I said that whites are being replaced well I don't I don't think I said that well it's been mentioned on your show 4,000 times and really when did I say that on your on your said whites are being replaced you have said that before really yeah I would
• 00:30 - 01:00 challenge you to cite that because I I'm pretty sure I haven't said that I said native I said native born Americans have are being replaced including blacks native born Americans native born Americans Americans whove like black Americans have been African-Americans have been in the United States for in many cases their families over 400 years and their concerns are every bit as real and valid and alive to me as the concerns of white people whose families have been there 400 years so I I've never said that whites are being replaced not one time and you can't it we just met but when our relationship
• 01:00 - 01:30 starts with a lie it makes it tough to be friends so let's pull that back I'm happy to explain what I do think well you actually can't said it because I didn't say it and I don't believe it and I'm telling you that to your face so why don't you just accept me at face value my concern is that the people who are born in the country are the main responsibility of its leaders and as noted earlier when those leaders shift their concern from the people whose responsibility it is to take care of to people around the world to put their priorities above that of their own citizens that's immoral and they are being replaced in my country people who
• 01:30 - 02:00 are born in the United States and the birth rate tells the whole story they're not at replacement rate and so the US population is growing because we're importing people from other countries and my view is that happy people have children and a functioning economy allows them to do that and we don't have that and so you need to fix the economy and fix the culture and make it so that people who want to have kids can you don't just go for the quick sugar fix of importing new people like that's my position and if you think that's racist
• 02:00 - 02:30 that's your problem I never told you a racist um but of course you but of course you are suggesting and I I must say one of the reasons people don't like people like you in the media is that you never say exactly what you mean your slurs are all by implication and you're about to tell me the great replacement theory is racist or antisemitic whatever I I've said what I've said to you right now like a hundred times in public I hope to if I live long enough to say it 100 more times I think it's completely honest and real not racist or scary it's factually true it's not a theory it's a
• 02:30 - 03:00 fact and your the whole point of your question was to be like you're a scary racist and my response is no I'm not okay well how about no more lying in your questions and then I'll answer it okay well um this is the same Theory or as you say idea that has inspired the New York Buffalo shooting where 11 black americ were Ked two white Americans were killed it's also it's not first of all it's inspired the worst the one of the worst Australian guns all time stupid in
• 03:00 - 03:30 the media I guess it doesn't pay well look I I'm sorry I've lived among people like you for too long and I I don't mean I don't mean to call you call you stupid maybe you're just pretending to be but I've never I'm totally against violence I'm totally against the war in Ukraine for example which doubtless you support and like all dutiful liberals support more Carnage I don't I hate mass shootings actually nothing I said what does it mean to inspire something My Views are not bigoted against any group they're honest they're factual that's
• 03:30 - 04:00 not hate that's reality and my views deriv from a deep concern for Americans actually Americans aren't having kids because they can't afford to and nobody in charge cares and so that's my position that doesn't Inspire mass shootings how dare you try to tie me to some lunatic who murdered people how dare you actually and in fact I mean do you know what I mean I'd be like you know Hitler wore those shoes a lot of people are saying that you're like Hitler can you explain those shoes Hitler were exactly the same shoes and
• 04:00 - 04:30 you're like I've got nothing to do with Hitler that's how I feel about your absurd disingenuous question right so therefore you support gun control what I thought it could get D but it did no I don't support disarming law- abiding people so they can't defend themselves so the government has a monopoly on violence I don't think so first of all in my country that's illegal as you know but moreover it should be illegal in every country a sovereign person has the right to defend himself self and his
• 04:30 - 05:00 family period and that said I'm totally opposed to harming anyone anyone have you been calling are you concerned about the war in Ukraine and the countless Innocents being murdered there every single day I doubt you are probably Putin bad I am I'm a Christian I hate violence I hate mass shootings I have guns at home and often I'm my person I'm in the United States I'm proud to say because I want to defend myself and those I love against violence that's the
• 05:00 - 05:30 point I'm not perpetrating crimes I'm not shooting strangers I'm defending what I love and if you're against that I guess I would ask why why would you be against that well so you don't think you Harbor any kind of responsibility for these hate crimes I'm sorry I'm trying to be charitable I'm trying to be charitable I was like maybe you're just pretending to be dumb now I don't think it's an act [Music]
• 05:30 - 06:00 Tako thank you uh for taking those questions I'm sure you enjoyed uh actually I L it I just feel sorry I mean because I got here in the country so unbelievably beautiful and the people are so cheerful and funny and cool and smart I'm like your media's got to be better than ours it can't just be a bunch of castrated robots reading questions from the boss and then it turns out it's exactly the same maybe even a tiny bit Dumber well America is plagued by the Spectre of fascist violence and in an
• 06:00 - 06:30 ironic twist these fascists call themselves anti-fascist antifa whenever conservatives want to speak on campus or hold a rally antifa groups are a reliable presence and they routinely try to Stamp Out speech using vigilante violence which they perversely justify as a form of self-defense Mike isacson is a professor at John J College of Criminal Justice he founded the antifa group smash racism DC and he joins us tonight Professor thanks for coming on hi how you doing thank you to for having me so your position tell me if I'm misch characterizing this is people you define
• 06:30 - 07:00 as fascist do not have free speech rights no uh my position is that communities have the right to defend themselves against uh groups that actively seek uh to eliminate members of that Community defend themselves against violence or defend themselves against violence I mean we were talking about no but no but physical violence so if I say we're talking about a history a group that has a history of crimes yeah no we not are we going to pretend like we're just we're we're suddenly uh in this ahistorical world uh where where Ro Ora
• 07:00 - 07:30 doesn't exist where and bra doesn't exist are you kidding me no are you really a professor by the way what so here's here's the question though is it past statements that have espoused violence or is it acts of violence so could you could you talk could you hold on let me just finish my question could could you commit violence against me if you thought that I had a history of saying things that you imagined were violent I I would never commit violence against you I actually when I was
• 07:30 - 08:00 younger I was a Libertarian and I actually looked up to you when you were a Libertarian okay but let let's let's take me out of this let's just I I want to know like the the concept of self-defense is a legal concept but it's also got like a long history and tradition and con law so the idea is if I'm hitting you if I strike you physically if I physically commit violence against you you have a right to commit violence back in order to protect yourself or your property but you're seeming to say that anybody who has espoused ideas that have at some point in history led to violence can be the
• 08:00 - 08:30 subject of violence from you you're not saying that no I'm not saying that what I'm saying is that I believe it is the right for communities to get together to assess what is a threat to them uh and to defend themselves against that threat so give me an example like what public figure in America right now could be shut down could have his Free Speech rights taken away and could be the subject of violence under the standards you're describing uh well I mean for instance I I I think that the framework here of of talking about violence as
• 08:30 - 09:00 opposed to talking about preserving the very freedoms that you and I both enjoy uh is is a false one I mean ultimately we're talking about a movement that actively Advocates against all the feds of democracy uh I mean we're talking about Richard Spencer who uh publishes an altright.com publishes an article uh in July 28th by a man named Vincent law uh where the headline was to protect Free Speech get rid of democracy um so we really you know I okay so let's let's use that example disagree with that I
• 09:00 - 09:30 haven't seen the piece but it doesn't sound like something I'd agree with it's not does Richard Spencer have a right to speak in public Richard Spencer is a danger to society when he speaks in public what he is doing he is publicly recruiting people to his very violent movement very violent ideology so does does does does he have a right to speak in public I don't think he has a right to speak in public un opposed and that is ultimately what the purpose of antifa is is to show off and oppos him but it's not opposition you shut people down you prevent them from speaking and you commit violence against them I know a
• 09:30 - 10:00 number of people don't tell me it's un true I know people who have been knocked down and beaten by people from antifa so that is true it does happen we have it on tape we just roll the tape right so you're saying is that justified yes I believe that communities have the right to defend themselves against threats to them to their Community against ideas they don't like no they right against people who have explicitly said that they want to eliminate those people from our society I you're conflating you're in violence with ideas if I have not
• 10:00 - 10:30 raised my hand to strike you you have no right to strike me you but in order to raise your hand to strike me you have to think that you're going to strike me and when you when you are going out in public as a protester explicitly saying that you want to eliminate most of the people from this country I believe most of the people in this country have the right to say no that's not okay okay but it's you absolutely have a right to say it's not okay what you don't have a right is to prevent me from saying what I think even if you disagree and you
• 10:30 - 11:00 definitely don't have a right to commit violence against me and you're blurring the lines there and by the way don't you work at a criminal it's hilarious okay um you don't have the right to do that you have the right to make a counter case do you see the dis Tucker when I when I walked into this building um I walked I counted five security guards at the front door uh and two police cars outside um are you going to tell me that the violence that they would enact against someone who is
• 11:00 - 11:30 looking to do you or any number of the people that work here harm are you going to tell me that the violence uh that they enact uh to protect preemptively uh the staff uh that are protected also by uh the barricades that you have uh I don't even know what you're honestly I'm not honestly not following you are you don't have security well I actually don't have security but there is security at your building for bu reason there is security no the reason that you you have security
• 11:30 - 12:00 is because ultimately that security provides a space for non-violent civil discourse which is UL you don't own so so now there are lots of million distinctions here but you don't own the Public Square you don't own the street believe the public owns the Public Square at the end of you're not in charge of the public and you're not charge we talking about a system that has been gerrymandering people out of public representation okay if we're relying on the cops those cops are
• 12:00 - 12:30 working for the very people that you work for and not in the interest of the vast majority of society we don't have represent we don't have representation by the state we don't last question do you teach students I do huh and do you teach them that the First Amendment does not apply to people they disagree with I teach them to think critically and that's why I'm very open about my antias and my anarchism so if someone in so if someone in your class said you know what I'm a trump I'm a trump voter I'm against affirmative I've had those and I encourage them to
• 12:30 - 13:00 research and explore and hold them to the exact same standards that hold any other student yeah I bet I do I had I had I had I had I had an alt-right supporter actually in my class last semester I worked I I worked with him on his papers he started off kind of bad at citation I got him better at citation and he wrote a paper that was an a a paper um I mean I am not discriminating against my students ultimately except you think that people you disagree should be beaten up but whatever all right Congressman I mean congressman
• 13:00 - 13:30 close Professor thanks for coming on I appreciate it