How to write a debate in seven easy steps

Summary

In this exciting video, Groobles Media walks you through the process of writing a debate in seven simple steps. From defining key terms to organizing your arguments, the video provides a comprehensive guide for both affirmative and negative teams. It emphasizes the importance of teamwork, research, and rebuttal preparation while offering practical tips to ensure a successful debate. Whether you're a seasoned debater or a beginner, these steps will help enhance your critical thinking and public speaking skills.

Highlights

• Learn how the structure of a debate team works - three on the affirmative and three on the negative side! 🤝
• Step one is all about the keywords; learn to define the debate's subject! 📚
• Debate structure is crucial—allocate arguments strategically across your speakers! 🎙️
• Research thoroughly, but be ready to counter the opposition’s points! 📑
• Effective rebuttal is key; anticipate and respond to the opposition's arguments! 🚀
• Don't forget the practice! Rehearse to boost your confidence before the big day! 🗣️
• Timing is everything; keep track to ensure you cover all points within limits! ⏱️

Key Takeaways

• Always start by defining your keywords for clarity and precision 🎯.
• Organize your team's arguments just like a strategic game plan 🏈.
• Research is key—know both your side and the opposition's 💡.
• Effective rebuttals can turn the tide of the debate 🌀.
• Managing your time during a debate keeps you in control ⏲️.
• Practice makes perfect—rehearse until you're confident 🎭.
• Debating hones your critical thinking and public speaking skills 💪.

Overview

Kicking things off, Groobles Media dives into defining the essential keywords of your debate topic. Whether you’re on the affirmative or negative team, getting these definitions right can make or break your argument. The video uses the hypothetical topic of colonizing Mars to demonstrate how to effectively define terms like ‘colonize’ and ‘Mars’ to support your side’s stance.

The next big step? Organizing and allocating your arguments across your team members. Groobles Media emphasizes the importance of strategy—deciding who will tackle global implications, who will address individual impacts, and who will summarize the debate. Researching your topic inside out is vital, as is preparing to rebut the opposition effectively. Even anticipating the arguments from the other side can give you a strategic edge.

Finally, it's all about preparation and practice. Timing your speech and rehearsing it so you’re relaxed and engaging are critical steps. Groobles Media reminds us that public speaking is an art, encouraging debaters to connect with their audience and speak confidently and clearly. With patience and effort, crafting a compelling debate becomes an enjoyable challenge.

Chapters

• 00:00 - 00:30: Introduction and Team Roles in Debating The chapter introduces the concept of debating and outlines team roles within a debate, specifically focusing on the affirmative and negative sides. It begins with the context of a video on how to run a debate gaining popularity and the speaker's return from retirement to discuss how to write a debate in seven steps. In formal debates, the affirmative team supports the topic, while the negative team opposes it.
• 00:30 - 01:30: Step 1: Defining Keywords The chapter 'Step 1: Defining Keywords' emphasizes the importance of clearly defining key terms in a debate topic. Using the example of the debate topic 'Humans should colonize Mars,' it suggests using dictionary definitions to clarify the meaning of each term: 'humans' refers to human beings, 'should' implies an obligation, 'colonize' means to send settlers, and 'Mars' refers to the planet. This foundational step sets the stage for a well-structured argument.
• 01:30 - 02:30: Step 2: Defining Argument In this chapter, the process of 'Defining Argument' is explored. Key words and phrases are researched and defined to establish a clear understanding of the topic being debated, which in this case involves the obligation of humans to send settlers to Mars, the fourth planet in our solar system. This step emphasizes the importance of defining key terms as part of preparing and structuring an argument for a debate. Definitions may differ based on the perspective of the affirmative or negative team.
• 02:30 - 03:30: Role of the First Speaker The chapter discusses the role of the first speaker in a debate, focusing on the affirmative side. It highlights the potential for manipulation of definitions to favor one side, and how this can be countered by the opposition. The first speaker is responsible for introducing the team's argument and defining key terms. They might start their speech with an illustrative scenario or historical example, such as beginning with 'Ladies and gentlemen, imagine that the year is 1492.'
• 03:30 - 05:30: Role of the Second Speaker Christopher Columbus is preparing to set sail across the ocean to discover a new world. However, before his departure, he is cautioned about various dangers that may arise during the voyage. These include harsh oceanic conditions, the potential for sickness on board, and overall uncertainty surrounding the trip's success. The chapter explores the hypothetical scenario of Columbus reconsidering and potentially cancelling his expedition due to these risks.
• 05:30 - 06:00: Role of the Third Speaker The chapter examines a hypothetical scenario where 21st-century scientists deem Mars expeditions too perilous due to potential illness and mission failure, leading to missed opportunities for humanity. It explores the implications of this decision and sets the stage for a debate by defining four key terms: 'humans,' 'should,' 'colonize,' and 'Mars.'
• 06:00 - 07:30: Step 3: Allocate Arguments The debate concerns the obligation of humans to colonize Mars, the fourth planet in our solar system. The affirmative team agrees with this interpretation and plans to argue in its favor. The chapter seems to primarily focus on the semantics of the debate topic by defining key terms like 'humans,' 'should,' 'colonize,' and 'Mars.' It sets the stage for the affirmative team's arguments related to humanity's obligation to send settlers to Mars.
• 07:30 - 09:00: Step 4: Researching and Writing This chapter discusses the process of allocating arguments in a debate. The third step is highlighted where some teams decide on the approach for their speakers. Typically, one speaker might tackle the broader, global implications of the topic, while another focuses on specific, individual impacts. An example given is about colonizing Mars, where the first speaker delves into the positive aspects like economic interests, leaving other aspects for the second speaker to address.
• 09:00 - 11:00: Step 5: Prepare Rebuttal The chapter 'Step 5: Prepare Rebuttal' discusses the impacts of Mars colonization on Earth, emphasizing technological advancements. It highlights that innovations developed for Mars can lead to technological progress on Earth as well. Furthermore, it mentions that the third speaker will summarize the affirmative team's arguments, critique the opposition, and reinforce the argument that humans should pursue colonization of Mars.
• 11:00 - 12:00: Step 6: Time Your Debate The chapter 'Step 6: Time Your Debate' seems to involve a structured debate context with the negative team addressing the global impacts of colonizing Mars. The first speaker presents the argument focusing on the financial costs associated with sending humans to Mars and argues that these funds could be more effectively used to address pressing issues on Earth, such as global warming. The second speaker will add to the team's argument by emphasizing the plight of marginalized individuals on Earth, detailing how resources could alleviate poverty and combat diseases, thus aiding millions of people.
• 12:00 - 14:00: Step 7: Practice This chapter focuses on the articulation of arguments against the colonization of Mars, highlighting potential dangers that colonists may face on the planet. It outlines the strategic collaboration required in debates, suggesting the significance of delivering strong arguments collectively rather than relying solely on one speaker to present the most compelling points.
• 14:00 - 15:30: Conclusion and Recap of Steps The chapter focuses on the fourth step in planning and researching debates, particularly the researching and writing phases. It emphasizes the importance of looking up facts and articles that support one's side of the debate topic, while also acknowledging counterarguments that the opposition might present. To effectively counter these, preparing rebuttals is crucial. The chapter also provides an example outline for the first speaker of the affirmative team's debate.

How to write a debate in seven easy steps Transcription

• 00:00 - 00:30 greetings here at grooble's media we are thrilled at the popularity of our video how to run a debate in fact i've been brought out of retirement to tell you how to write a debate in seven easy steps remember in a formal debate there are three on the affirmative side and three on the negative side [Music] if you are the affirmative team you will agree with the topic and if you are the negative team you
• 00:30 - 01:00 will disagree with it the first step in writing your debate is defining the key words for example if your topic was that humans should colonize mars you would define the words humans should colonize and mars you can do this by referring to a dictionary definition humans means human beings should means an obligation colonize means to send settlers and mars
• 01:00 - 01:30 is the fourth planet in our solar system once you have researched the dictionary definition you replace the key word with these words this is the second step defining your argument therefore the topic for this debate means that human beings are obligated to send settlers to the fourth planet of our solar system the definition of the keywords may vary between the affirmative and negative team
• 01:30 - 02:00 this won't be an issue most times however one team may manipulate the dictionary definition to purposely bias their side of the argument this can be rebutted by the opposition the first speaker of the affirmative side introduces the team's argument and defines the key words they may begin with an introduction based on a scenario and research for example the first speaker of the affirmative side may begin with ladies and gentlemen imagine that the year is 1492
• 02:00 - 02:30 and christopher columbus is about to set sail across the ocean in search of a new world but before he sets sail he's told of the dangers that could lie ahead he's warned about the harsh conditions of the ocean the sickness that could break out on board the uncertainty of the voyage what if he decided that the risks were too great and cancelled the expedition
• 02:30 - 03:00 now what if scientists in the 21st century decided the same thing that an expedition to mars was too dangerous that people might become sick and the voyage might not be successful what opportunities would humankind be missing out on they continue by defining the key words there are four key words in today's debate humans should colonize and mars
• 03:00 - 03:30 according to the dictionary humans means human beings should means an obligation colonize means to send settlers and mars is the fourth planet in our solar system therefore today's debate can be interpreted to mean that human beings have an obligation to send settlers to the fourth planet in our solar system which we the affirmative team wholeheartedly agree but the big question here is when you're planning your debates
• 03:30 - 04:00 what should you write and who should argue what this is the third step allocate arguments some teams will have the first speaker approach the debate looking at the global implications of the topic and the second speaker should focus on the individual impact for example as first speaker today i will discuss what it will mean for the world of science to colonize mars i will outline the positives such as economic interests in its resources our second speaker
• 04:00 - 04:30 will outline how the colonization of mars will affect individuals here on earth advances in technology on the red planet will see advances in technology for us all finally our third speaker will summarize our team's case summarize that of the opposition and leave you in no doubt that humans should colonize mars alternatively the negative team may also begin with the first speaker
• 04:30 - 05:00 looking at the global impacts of colonizing mars as first speaker of the negative team i will focus on factors such as the cost of sending people to mars and how that money would be better spent on earth and focus on issues such as global warming our second speaker will focus on the individuals of this planet that are forgotten he will look at the issues of poverty and disease and how the money could help millions of people here on earth he will also focus
• 05:00 - 05:30 on the unnecessary dangers that could face colonists on the red planet and our third speaker will summarize our case summarize the case of the opposition and convince you all that humans should not colonize mars other teams may say the first speaker should deliver the strongest arguments and the second speaker the weaker ones what is important is that both teams must work together in
• 05:30 - 06:00 planning and researching their debates this is our fourth step researching and writing when researching look up facts and articles about the topic look for information that supports your side of the topic however don't dismiss arguments that support the opposition side but prepare a bottles in case they use some of these an outline for the first speaker of the affirmative teams debate may look like this
• 06:00 - 06:30 introduction to find the key words introduce the team's arguments continue debate with more arguments summarize main points the first speaker of the negative team will have a similar structure but they will also have to rebut the first speaker of the affirmative introduction define key words introduce teams argument rebuttal continue with more arguments summarize the outline for the second
• 06:30 - 07:00 speakers will also be similar to this structure however more time should be given to rebuttal the third speakers should not introduce new arguments they need to focus on rebutting the opposition's case and summarizing their own that brings us to our next step prepare rebuttal some rebuttal may be pre-planned as you can guess what the opposition may say in advance you will need to
• 07:00 - 07:30 listen carefully during the debate to the opposition's argument to write effective rebuttal carefully write down the point they say that you disagree with explain why they are wrong in making that point and why your team's argument is more valid to ensure that you have enough to speak about time your debate time your debate and prepared rebuttal so you are confident that you will meet the time limit place the approximate time of your prepared rebuttal on your palm cards
• 07:30 - 08:00 so you know how long each one will take to say out loud the last step is to practice the more familiar you are with your presentation the more comfortable you will be in presenting to an audience be sure to practice so you can make eye contact with the audience and not refer to your notes too often so let's recap step 1 define the keywords step 2 define argument step three
• 08:00 - 08:30 allocate arguments step four research and write step five prepare rebuttal step six time your debate step 7 practice finally enjoy debating it can be challenging arguing a topic but also rewarding and make you a better critical thinker be sure to like and subscribe and remember the sky's the limit