Updated Jul 24

Share this article

More on This Story

How to Benchmark LLMs: Five Mistakes That Skew Your Results

Aug 21, 2026

How to Benchmark LLMs: Five Mistakes That Skew Your Results

Most in‑house model comparisons are run in a way that guarantees a misleading answer. Not a wrong one exactly, and rarely a dishonest one. Just an answer that would have come out differently if the person running it had pressed enter a second time.

Infrastructure for Continuous Web Data Collection

Aug 14, 2026

Infrastructure for Continuous Web Data Collection

A one‑off scrape is a weekend project. Running the same collection job every hour for three years is an infrastructure problem, and most teams underestimate how different those two things are. Continuous collection breaks in ways that batch jobs don't. Sites redesign their markup, rate limits tighten overnight, and the IP pool that worked in March gets flagged by June. The stack has to absorb all of it without a human watching the logs. Here's what the working parts look like when a pipeline actually holds up.

Can You Become Emotionally Dependent on an AI Therapist?

Aug 10, 2026

Can You Become Emotionally Dependent on an AI Therapist?

California's New Deepfake Law Could Impact Elon Musk's Social Media Activities

New Law Goes After AI Deepfake Posters

California's New Deepfake Law Could Impact Elon Musk's Social Media Activities

By OpenTools Team

California's new AB 2839 law can put social media users, including high‑profile figures like Elon Musk, in legal trouble for reposting AI‑generated deepfakes that deceive voters. The legislation targets distributors of fake content about candidates on the ballot and aims to deter malicious activities leading up to the 2024 elections.

California's latest legislation could potentially place social media users who post or even repost AI‑generated deepfakes in significant legal jeopardy, especially if these posts deceive voters about upcoming elections. Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed AB 2839 into law, effective immediately, emphasizing its capacity to curb the spread of deceptive content online. Newsom pointed out that the law could apply to well‑known figures like Elon Musk, who has previously reposted deepfakes that falsely depicted Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to Newsom, the law will specifically prevent the deliberate distribution of advertisements or other election‑related communications that are materially deceptive, including AI‑generated deepfakes. The legislation targets distributors rather than the creators of such content or the platforms on which they are shared. This is significant as it allows individuals who encounter such deepfakes on social media to seek injunctive relief. Essentially, a judge could mandate that the offending content be removed or impose financial penalties on the poster.

This law is one of the strictest regulations in the United States aimed at election‑related AI deepfakes as the 2024 presidential election approaches. It targets the malicious spread of false information that could potentially mislead voters, specifically within a 120‑day window before and a 60‑day window after an election in California. Leora Gershenzon, the policy director at California Initiative for Technology and Democracy (CITED), states that the law aims to deter individuals from posting such misleading content in the first place.

Gershenzon highlighted that the main objective of AB 2839 is preventative. Although the law includes provisions for monetary damages and injunctive relief, its ultimate goal is to act as a deterrent against the dissemination of deceptive AI‑generated deepfakes. The focus is to ensure these deepfakes do not influence the outcome of elections fraudulently. The law covers all forms of communication, including TV, radio, phone, texts, and internet‑based platforms.

The law applies not only to state and local elections but also to federal candidates appearing on California ballots. If an AI‑generated deepfake contains a clear disclaimer stating it is a work of fiction, it does not fall under AB 2839. However, Elon Musk seems to be testing the boundaries of this new legislation. After the law was enacted, Musk reposted a deepfake of Kamala Harris, which quickly garnered over 31 million impressions on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Beyond California, other jurisdictions are closely watching the implementation and enforcement of AB 2839. As social media continues to be a battleground for information and misinformation, there is significant interest in how effective such a law will be in curbing the malicious spread of AI‑generated deepfakes. This law could serve as a model for other states looking to regulate the misuse of AI in election misinformation.

Musk’s recent actions have brought heightened scrutiny and legal challenges, not just from California but also from international bodies. For instance, Brazil has fined Musk's platform X for allegedly failing to combat fake news and hate speech, demonstrating a global trend toward stricter regulations on digital platforms. Elon Musk's willingness to repost deepfakes raises questions about the level of accountability and enforcement that will be applied under California's new law.

Governor Newsom has not ruled out the possibility of legal action against Musk for his reposts of AI deepfakes, emphasizing that while parody remains protected, fraudulent manipulations that jeopardize democratic processes will not be tolerated. Newsom’s firm stance underscores the importance of maintaining election integrity in the age of advanced digital media.

This legislation marks a significant step toward addressing the challenges posed by AI‑generated content in the digital age. Its efficacy in preventing the spread of deceptive election‑related deepfakes will be closely monitored, especially given the high stakes of upcoming elections. The focus will not only be on punishing wrongdoers but also on preventing the spread of such harmful content in the first place, thus protecting the democratic process.