Tool decision guide

Best AI Research Assistants: Consensus and Elicit for Academic Work

Choose Consensus for evaluation when you want to find papers and explore a research question through cited analysis. Choose Elicit when the work needs a structured table, screening criteria or repeated extraction across papers. This shortlist separates discovery from the work of building an auditable literature review.

By OpenTools · Updated

Choose by workflow, limits and deliverablesScroll across to compare all columns.
Buying questionConsensusElicitWhat to check
Main workflowAcademic search and cited Pro or Deep analysis.Semantic search, research reports, screening and structured extraction.Start from the research artifact you need.
Free access15 Pro messages and up to three Deep reviews/month, plus basic search.Unlimited paper search and summaries; limited agent and reports usage.Match the quota to recurring research questions.
Paid annual basisPro $12/month billed $144/year; Deep $45/month billed $540/year.Pro $49/user/month billed $588/year; Scale $169/user/month billed $2,028/year.These are annual commitments, not verified monthly checkout prices.
Structured reviewCited synthesis and research tools.Pro lists 5,000-paper screening and 20 table columns at a time.Trial the required inclusion rules and extraction fields.
CollaborationTeam and enterprise options are linked; confirm exact controls.Scale lists live editing and seat-management controls.Check how reviewers share and correct the final artifact.

Choose the output before choosing the assistant

A broad question such as “what affects employee retention?” can lead to several jobs. You may need a short answer with credible papers to read, or a table comparing populations, methods and findings across dozens of studies. Consensus presents an academic search and cited-analysis workflow. Elicit documents semantic search plus screening and extraction. Those workflows can overlap, but the output you need should decide the trial. Write down the fields and sources a colleague would need to check your conclusion before comparing plans.

Use discovery to build a reading list

Start with a narrow question, then change one element of it: the population, outcome, time period or setting. Inspect whether the assistant returns a useful range of papers or repeats the same few sources. Consensus offers Pro messages and longer Deep reviews; Elicit offers search, summaries and research reports. A larger advertised paper corpus does not prove stronger coverage of your particular discipline. Keep a few known relevant papers as a reference set and check whether the search finds them. That makes the evaluation more useful than judging how polished an answer sounds.

Evaluate extraction as a repeatable workflow

For structured reviews, agree on inclusion criteria before asking an assistant to screen papers. In Elicit, the Pro plan lists a dedicated review workflow that can screen 5,000 papers and add 20 columns to tables at a time. Test a small set with fields such as study design, sample, outcome and limitations. Include a paper that should be excluded and one that does not report a requested value. The useful behavior is a traceable answer or a clear missing value. An invented number can make an otherwise tidy table unusable.

Budget for the quota and billing term

Consensus Free lists 15 Pro messages and up to three Deep reviews per month. Its annual pricing view lists Pro at a $12 monthly equivalent, billed $144 annually, with unlimited Pro messages and 15 Deep reviews per month. Deep is a $45 monthly equivalent billed $540 annually, with 200 Deep reviews per month. Elicit Basic offers free search and summaries with limited agent and report usage. Elicit Pro is $49 per user/month billed $588 annually; Scale is $169 billed $2,028 annually. These prices were checked September 11, 2026. Count the reviews, collaborators and extraction work you expect before making an annual commitment.

Make the source check part of the handoff

For each conclusion, save the research question, the original paper and the passage supporting the claim. Distinguish direct findings from interpretation, and record any papers you excluded. Check whether a cited paper actually studied your target population and whether its limitations change the conclusion. Ask a colleague to reproduce one row of the extraction table or one key claim from the original source. This guide compares documented capabilities and pricing; it does not rank output accuracy from a hands-on benchmark. The Consensus vs Elicit comparison is a compact starting point for your trial.

Common questions

Which AI research assistant is better for a literature review?

Elicit is the more directly documented fit for structured screening and extraction. Consensus is useful to shortlist for academic discovery and cited synthesis. Define your review method and verify the underlying papers whichever tool you use.

Is Consensus Pro $12 month to month?

The reviewed annual pricing view shows $12 per month billed as $144 annually. That does not establish a $12 month-to-month subscription.

What does Elicit Pro include?

The current annual plan displays $49 per user/month, billed as $588 annually. It lists a systematic-review workflow that can screen 5,000 papers, 20 table columns at a time and reports using up to 135 sources.

Can I start for free?

Elicit Basic lists unlimited paper search, summaries and chat with papers where full text is available, with limited Research Agent and Reports usage. Consensus Free lists basic search, 15 Pro messages and up to three Deep reviews per month.

Do citations make an AI answer reliable?

A citation gives you a claim to check. Open the source, confirm it supports the statement, inspect the study design and distinguish the authors’ findings from the assistant’s interpretation.

Continue your research

Sources and approach

This guide compares documented features and access conditions. It does not present hands-on output tests. Check the provider’s current terms before paying or uploading files.