Devastating Blue Origin News

Summary

Highlights

• Footage showed a small ignition event quickly turning into a massive fireball 🔥
• The blast appeared to climb from the engine section up the vehicle in a cascading failure 🌪️
• Blue Origin’s statement called it an “anomaly,” but the visuals told a much bigger story 😬
• Commentary suggested serious damage to Launch Complex 36 and nearby hardware 🏗️
• The discussion compared the scale of the event to past major rocket failures in the industry 📉
• Jared Isaacman said NASA would assess impacts to Artemis and Moon-based programs 🛰️

Key Takeaways

• Blue Origin suffered a major anomaly during a New Glenn hot fire test 🚨
• The explosion appears to have destroyed the rocket, transporter-erector, and at least part of the pad 🧨
• Blue Origin confirmed all personnel were safe and accounted for ✅
• The failure could delay New Glenn’s next flight and major Amazon Leo launches 📡
• NASA’s Artemis and lunar plans may feel indirect pressure from the setback 🌕
• The hosts framed this as another reminder that rocket development is brutally hard 🚀

Overview

Chapters

• 00:00 - 02:30: Breaking Blue Origin Anomaly The speaker breaks in with urgent news about a major Blue Origin development test failure, describing a devastating explosion during recent testing and expressing shock at the scale of the incident.
• 02:30 - 05:00: What Happened During the Static Fire During the static fire preparation for New Glenn, the engines began to ignite normally, but the test suddenly escalated into smaller explosions that climbed up the rocket and ended in a massive fireball. The entire rocket, transporter erector, and one lightning tower were lost, raising concerns about extensive damage to the launch site and possibly to a nearby hangar containing the remaining booster.
• 05:00 - 07:30: Explosion Footage and Immediate Damage Assessment Footage from the static fire test shows Blue Origin’s New Glenn suffering a massive explosion while preparing for its fourth flight, apparently starting near the lower section and rapidly spreading upward. The discussion notes that the rocket was not fully fueled because it was only a static fire, which likely reduced the severity of the incident. Blue Origin confirmed an anomaly during the hot fire test and said all personnel were accounted for, while reactions emphasized how serious the failure is given the recent FAA clearance and the planned Amazon Leo satellite launch payload.
• 07:30 - 10:00: Operational Fallout for New Glenn and Blue Origin The segment describes the immediate aftermath of the hot fire anomaly, noting visible fires, shaking structures, and uncertainty about whether responders can safely access the pad yet. Blue Origin says only that an anomaly occurred and that all personnel are accounted for, while the area remains too dangerous for a full assessment.
• 10:00 - 15:00: Impact on Amazon Satellites and NASA Missions This segment explains that the explosion at Blue Origin’s launch site has immediate ripple effects on the company’s planned missions, including the Mark1 lander for the Moon Base Part One program, which can no longer launch as scheduled because the pad is damaged. The speakers compare the incident to earlier SpaceX testing accidents, noting that rockets are difficult and that static-fire tests can have serious consequences even when the vehicle is only partially fueled.
• 15:00 - 20:00: Investigation, Recovery Timeline, and Broader Industry Context The discussion turns to the scale of the New Glenn launch failure and the likely recovery timeline. Because the rocket and pad infrastructure are so large and interconnected, the speakers estimate it could take about a year, or at least well into the following year, before another New Glenn flight, given the extensive rebuild needed for the pad, towers, transport equipment, pipes, and other systems.
• 20:00 - 25:00: Final Reactions and Ongoing Updates The speakers react to reports that Blue Origin’s New Glenn suffered a major failure during a static fire test in Florida, describing the situation as a developing story with potentially monumental consequences. They note that initial reporting suggests the failure began in the first stage engine section, involving the rocket’s seven BE-4 engines, and compare the explosion’s scale to major historical rocket failures. The discussion also mentions that this setback is especially significant because Blue Origin had been viewed by some as a strong partner for supporting Artemis missions.

Devastating Blue Origin News Transcription

• Segment 1: 00:00 - 02:30 Okay, everyone. I was not planning on going live, but there is some major major breaking news. Uh pretty tragic news actually for Blue Origin um as far as you know their development uh with their program. And let me just show you some videos so that you can kind of understand why this is such a big deal. Joe Tagmire is about to hop on with me in a second here, but essentially uh Blue Origin was doing some testing tonight and well, this happened just insane. Absolutely insane. Um this happened maybe in the last hour. Uh so apologies for being a little bit late to the party here in reporting on this, but this is a huge deal. Um and absolutely devastating. Um not only is it going to set them back for quite some time now, we'll see how much time, this is probably going to put even more pressure and reliance on SpaceX. And let me share another video with you. Uh this is I mean this is like I I can't even believe my eyes. Uh so here's another view. This is from NSF and You know what is happening? Like literally what is happening? I'm I'm just shocked right now. >> Yes, you're right. This is a huge explosion. So, we're going to have Joe on here in a minute just to talk about some of the implications of this, but I do feel very very bad for Blue Origin tonight. Um, and you know, it remains to be seen of how long this is going to set them back because obviously, well, this is a big deal. Um, yeah. So, uh, let's see. Is there any sound on this? I don't know if there's actually any sound on this, but um let's see really quickly if Blue Origin has made a statement, which by the way, New Glenn 4 was, you know, going to be launching pretty soon here and um you know, launching some some satellites for Amazon Leo. It would actually be the first time because previously Amazon Leo if you don't know is the competitor
• Segment 2: 00:00 - 02:30 competitor uh to Starlink. Um and
• Segment 3: 02:30 - 05:00 previously they have been using SpaceX and ULA to get their satellites up but they were going to use New Glenn for the first time. That was pretty exciting. Um as we know on the last New Glenn flight there were a lot of things that went right. Some things that went wrong. one of the most important things went wrong which was they lost the customer payload for as um unfortunately this happening is is a truly I feel so bad for them right now um very bad for them uh so this this is a big deal but let's see Joe we just got Joe on to talk about this Joe this is thank you by the way for you know cluing me in I'm just thinking What kind of news would there be at 900 p.m. on a Thursday? Apparently big news. So, let's talk about your reactions. Did you see this live? >> Uh, I did. Yes. I was just uh I don't know seeing how it was going. I saw that they were doing a static fire and sorry about the thing behind me here. I'll see if I can get rid of that. But uh >> yeah, they um they uh they were they were in the final preparation for the static fire. Uh it was looking pretty well or pretty good. They started the water delu system. You could see the engines just beginning to light and then something dramatically happened where you could see like smaller explosions and then you could almost see it working its way up the rocket and then there was almost a secondary explosion at the top and then it was just a gigantic uh a massive fireball. So much so that um you know this image that you're showing right now is the aftermath. Before this, there were two lightning towers and the transporter erector and the rocket. Um, one of those towers is gone. The transporter erector and the rocket are obviously gone. And, uh, I'm expecting a lot of damage to the launch site. Um, and there's a couple other things to
• Segment 4: 02:30 - 05:00 consider is the uh the main hanger where they keep all of the uh the other boosters. uh the the only booster that they have left it was in that hanger and it's not too far away from here. So it's possible there would be some sort of damage to that too. So this is pretty devastating.
• Segment 5: 05:00 - 07:30 >> Yeah. And so just to be clear like this was a static fire in preparation for the fourth flight of New Glenn. Correct. >> Correct. They were going to be launching I it may be 46 or 48 LEO Amazon LEO satellites. They were not on here. They did not have the payload, but you can see it here where it's starting at the bottom there something at the top and then just this massive explosion. >> Oh my. >> And since it's a static fire, they didn't have it fully loaded with fuel, which is, you know, kind of a saving grace. Uh, I mean Elon apparently just replied to Blue Origin's message on X saying, "Sorry to see this. I hope you recover quickly." So, I'm going to try to see what exactly Blue Origin said. Okay. All they said so far is, "We experienced an anomaly during today's hot fire test. All personnel have been accounted for. We will provide updates as we learn more." Well, that's an understatement. Um, the, you know, to put it lightly, right? Right. And you know they this is right off of uh having an upper stage issue and they just got clearance from the FAA to proceed with this launch. >> Oh my gosh. Right. Because they just shared yesterday May 28th Amazon Leo up next for Blue Origin. Leo New Glenn uh LN01 is the first of 24 LEO launches on Blue Origin's new reusable heavy lift rocket and will be our largest payload yet with 48 LEO satellites on board. Not anymore. So Joe, like looking at this footage, what do you think happened? >> Uh they were in the process of starting the engines and it could have been just a massive uh failure of one of the engines that then just cascaded. Maybe it it was it blew up and affected not only the tanks, but maybe some of the fuel lines. Like I said, it looked like it worked its way up to the top of the rocket. Um, and that means that it was probably in a
• Segment 6: 05:00 - 07:30 fuel line or in the tanks and that at that point there was nothing they could do. It was just a gigantic uh explosion. Um, quite a bit of force. And you know, this is their only launch site too. So, we saw what happened with ship uh 36 over at Massiey's. >> Oh my god. >> And this is much much larger. And it took SpaceX
• Segment 7: 07:30 - 10:00 probably eight or nine, eight months, nine months, maybe a little bit more to get Masses back in operation. >> This is >> Watch the towers. You can see them shaking. >> Oh my god. >> You see it displacing. >> Crazy footage. absolutely insane. And so it's been a little over an hour since this incident occurred. For all of you guys tuning in, um, you know, this happened, as you can see on the time stamp there, about 900 p.m. Eastern time, uh, it was supposed to just be a static fire, right? And and so now, you know, we're we're still getting details. Blue Origin hasn't said much. Um, all they've said is, "We've experienced an anomaly during today's hot fire test." Well, that's one way to put it. All personnel have been accounted for. We will provide updates as we learn more. So, I'm not sure if they're even out to to to the area yet to to the pad because it's probably not safe, right? >> Yeah. I think I'm just looking off screen onto a live shot and there's still fires all over the the the area around and in the launch site. >> And like I said, the the hanger, the the the big building that they have, the other booster and a lot of their other flight hardware, possibly even uh some of the satellites if it was prepared in a payload is not too far away from here. >> Wow. So yeah, I mean once they get the the initial fires out and make sure the place is safe, then they can get people out to start really assessing the damage. But my guess is the remaining tower that's standing there is probably severely damaged. It's going to have to be replaced. Um and you can see the water tank nearby. Um it may have had some damage, too. So this is this is quite devastating to not only Blue Origin for a while. I mean they're going to have to assess that they're going to have to do a lot of rebuilding and I
• Segment 8: 07:30 - 10:00 think that they will, you know, come back and they'll come back better. Um but uh the implications of this are going to be widespread and felt very quickly. Uh not only within Blue Origin, we know Amazon with their LEO satellites, they are trying to get those up for their constellation. that's obviously going to be taking a pretty big hit. The biggest uh good thing is NASA, they just two days ago announced
• Segment 9: 10:00 - 12:30 that the Mark1 lander >> from Blue Origin is going to was going to launch this year and it's part of the moon base part one and that is clearly not going to happen now because uh even if they had flight hardware to go, there's no launch site to launch it from. >> Wow. So there's just like a a cascade of effects. I mean this h I I feel so bad for for everyone at Blue Origin. Jeff Bezos also just shared on X, all personnel are accounted for and safe. It's too early to know the root cause, but we're already working to find it. Very rough day, but we'll rebuild whatever needs uh whatever needs uh rebuilding and get back to flying. It's worth it. Yeah. >> Oh man, I just I feel so bad for them. >> Yeah. Well, you know what we've seen with both SpaceX and now Blue Origin, you can't take uh static fires and tests lightly. Um >> man, these are rockets. You know, >> you know what? It's it's almost been a year because it was I think last was it June when we had that happen at U Massis? >> It was summer time frame. I don't remember if it was June or not, but it's been year. Yeah. >> Yeah. and that, you know, obviously they were able to kind of uh pull a maggyver and and use the pad um in this unique way, but um I don't really Blue Origin has that option. No, I was going to say the the thing about at that time with SpaceX with ship 36 and the damage that they had is ironically they were coming toward an end with the V2s and they were already looking ahead to the V3s and they were going to have to rebuild any everything anyway. So they were kind of in a better position in the sense that they were transferring to the next generation. This is Blue Origin's generation. So, you know, it's it's a it's a big hit for them. Yeah, Elon also responded to another
• Segment 10: 10:00 - 12:30 post um saying most unfortunate rockets are hard and you know we >> seen him also um in the in the early days when things were really hard and he was collecting pieces and the a toll of quadrilene and whatnot but this is um you know it just seems so unexpected right? Well,
• Segment 11: 12:30 - 15:00 kind of. Yes. I also just, you know, Blue Origin, they've had a few flights with the New Glenn, but it's still a very new system and they're just getting, you know, understanding how it works. Um, it's SpaceX went through a lot of different rockets and a lot of problems like this early on and and in the standpoint of the New Glenn program, it's like the early days of SpaceX with the Falcon because they're just getting that going. Um, the other thing I would I would say is, you know, this isn't just something Blue Origin or SpaceX has got to deal with. Uh, we assume that like, you know, the big race with China and stuff that they're immune to this. They they're they're building much bigger rockets. They're trying to do something big, too. So, it's it could happen to anybody. It doesn't matter if you're a country, a big company, or whatever. Um, and it's part of the process of building rockets. >> Yeah. or it doesn't matter if you're one of the richest people in the world, you know, things >> like this can happen. Do you know freaking Moon Kid wants to know, do you know what percentage of fuel was loaded in in this? >> I do not. Um, but since it was a static fire or they call it a hot fire, my guess is that uh they had relatively very little methane, just enough to do the static fire, they probably had a good amount of oxygen on it, maybe to help with weighing down the rocket or or making it more stable. Uh, but uh it was certainly not fully loaded and of course it didn't have the upper stage or the payload. So it, you know, if it were to happen on a launch day, this could have been much much worse is the sense of the the explosion, but this was pretty pretty devastating. I mean, even with a partial load, you can see the the the damage that was done to the entire site. >> Yeah, that was just eight minutes of this these same two videos on a loop,
• Segment 12: 12:30 - 15:00 but I'm just gonna keep playing them. Yeah, it's kind of funny because most of the the the like NSF and also I think spaceflight now they were just covering the static fire and there's only certain areas you can have the cameras. So, we only have a few areas. Um, this one, as a matter of fact, I believe was done by Jerry Pike, who is a drone operator, who does a lot of drone flights, and he was filming this uh and almost out of battery when it happened. So, it's very lucky that we had the NSF shot. >> Seriously. Wow. Oh my gosh. >> I've seen some other cameras uh angles where like they were trained on the VAB and you could see the VAB light up as if
• Segment 13: 15:00 - 17:30 it's daylight, you know. >> And so what do you think, you know, I don't know how long until we get another new Glenn flight? >> Um I'm seriously thinking a year from now. Certainly into next year. I I mean it's not a matter of just having a booster to go or anything. It's the amount of rebuild they're going to have to do on this pad is is probably pretty extensive. And it's more than just the towers and the TE. It's all of the pipes, all the systems, maybe some tank damage, maybe some damage to the water deluge. Um, yeah, I this is just this rocket is as big as a as a Saturn 5. Just >> not a small rocket. It's much bigger than a Falcon 9. >> Geez. trying to see if there's any new um like updates or I mean there's you know there's only so much uh let's see what people are saying. >> Yeah, it looks like it's definitely making the rounds on X. Um >> and and remind people like let's orient people this is at launch complex 36, >> correct? >> And so where is that like in relation to what SpaceX launches from? Um, I believe it's farther south of both 30. Well, it's south of 39 and it's I think it's generally in the in a it's not close, but it's in the general vicinity of 37, which is where SpaceX is building two more towers and eventually we'll have their operations. Um, so it's all on that coast part kind of falling down or falling along the coastline where 39A would be uh farther to the north and then these work their way to the south. Um, they apparently there is some degree of sharing of uh some of the commodities pipelines uh maybe like for nitrogen, maybe oxygen, whatever uh that goes to different sites. There's supposed to be a Falcon 9 launch tomorrow out of pad of Slick 40, I believe. That may or may not be
• Segment 14: 15:00 - 17:30 affected by this. It's hard to tell. Uh they may just stand down operations for a little while just so that they can get a good assessment of what all is going on, but uh um but yeah, so this is farther away from the VAB than 39 or even 37 or 40 would be, I believe. Well,
• Segment 15: 17:30 - 20:00 part of Grock's summary here is the 321 ft rocket's first stage. So, 321 feet, just to put it into perspective, nicknamed no, it's necessary and built for 25 flights, is now lost, likely delaying certification and Amazon's broadband rollout. Um, you know, people are worried about the impacts, as we mentioned, on NASA's Artemis program. And so that's I think I think why you know when you first reach out to me about this it's like >> yeah this is this is a bummer but this has all these ripple effects right so much is much like so much is hinging on Starship you know a lot of stuff is hinging on Blue Origin and this is not the time >> to to be dealing with this so I really feel for them I really >> I'd also just remind everybody we're all on team space and >> course >> Blue Origin SpaceX You have Axiom, Rocket Lab, Firefly is a big player. Now, all of these companies are part of NASA's Aremis program and the larger United States space policy and space program. And this is going to have effects on everybody else. What those are going to be is going to be interesting to find out. I I saw that Jared reposted u I think a congressman from Florida talked about this. So obviously Jared's aware of that and maybe we'll get some sort of uh update from NASA of what the impacts may be. But certainly, you know, it's kind of funny to think that up until very recently, people were thinking the Aremis 3 may had a better shot of rendevousing with Blue Origins lander than SpaceX. Now we're back to we don't know and maybe more pressure is back on SpaceX. It's really hard to know >> which, you know, they don't really need any more pressure. I mean, they're already, you know, have a lot on their on their own. Uh, you know, things that
• Segment 16: 17:30 - 20:00 that they're doing hard things, but wow. I uh I just what a what a crazy turn of events. I remember seeing like tweets earlier today of like, oh yeah, they're going to be doing a a static fire in a few hours. And I did not expect Joe, you're always watching it live. I really need I need No, I need to like learn from you and like watch these things live because my goodness. Um uh Ross says that Eric Burgerer, who is the uh author of Liftoff and senior editor at RS Technica, just posted about this, you
• Segment 17: 20:00 - 22:30 know, with the consequences obviously being monumental. So, let's see what he had to say. Okay, so he wrote he wrote a an article here, but based on a handful of sources, this is what I've been able to glean about the new Glenn failure this evening in Florida. TLDDR, it's freaking bad. >> Um, so yeah, let's see if goes along with what we're saying and and we're all just trying to, you know, take stock of what this is going to be. But I agree with him. The consequences are going to be significant. It's kind of ironic. Eric Burgerer was kind of leaning more on the team New Glenn as far as being being able to support Artemis better than SpaceX. So, I'm sure this is, >> you know, from him and all of his sources and what he's been hearing, this is truly devastating. >> Well, I'll just read you a short little snippet. He says it is possibly the most dramatic and powerful rocket explosion since the Soviet Union's N1 rocket was destroyed during a launch attempt in 1969. There was no immediate indication as to what caused the rocket to fail during the initial stages of the static fire test. The failure originated within the first stage of the rocket which is powered by seven BE4 engines. Uh sources said the problem appeared to start in the engine section of the vehicle. So, you know, everyone, this is a developing story. I wanted to just do this live stream really quickly. I'm going to upload this as a video because they typically do a little better. Um, looks like Jared might have also just posted, so let's see what he has to say. But essentially, there will be more to this story. So, yeah. >> Um, this is not the last that you're going to hear about it, and we're probably going to get a lot more information as to why exactly this
• Segment 18: 20:00 - 22:30 happened. But let me read you what NASA administrator Jared Isaacman just posted about, you know, 30 seconds ago. NASA is aware of the anomaly that occurred tonight at launch complex 36 involving Blue Origin's new Glenn rocket at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Space flight is unforgiving and developing new heavy lift launch capability is extraordinarily difficult. We will work with our partners to support a thorough investigation of this anomaly, assess near-term mission impacts, and get back to launching rockets. We will provide information on any impacts to the Aremis and Moonbased programs as it becomes available. So, man, what a what a crazy first few months as NASA administrator for Jared Isaacman.
• Segment 19: 22:30 - 25:00 >> He certainly didn't come into a boring time. >> No, he did not. So, uh we we will keep you guys up to date on this story. Um, but I want to make sure to get this out there as a video as well. Um, and so, you know, just wow. Uh, this is not un I mean, it's it's it's incredible footage, but this is not the footage that we wanted to see tonight. Um, >> and I appreciate you having me on. I mean, that's just my my initial impressions and thoughts, but my real thought is, wow, this is just so horrible. and not only for our space program, but for all the all the Blue Origin employees that have been working super hard on this, too. I mean, as a reminder, they shut down the uh New Shepard program and they've dedicated all of their efforts to doing this and uh this is a big a big pill to take. >> Yep. Absolutely. Well, uh thanks for watching. Sorry to be the bearers of bad news. Um but we'll I'm going to keep you guys up to date on this story. I'm sure we're going to get a lot more information in the morning, but that's the latest as of right now. >> Yeah.