Get the latest AI workflows to boost your productivity and business performance, delivered weekly by expert consultants. Enjoy step-by-step guides, weekly Q&A sessions, and full access to our AI workflow archive.
Summary
In this video, Project Farm embarks on an adventure to find out whether the price of a dash cam correlates with its performance quality. From testing cheap $22 models to $120 high-end options, each cam is put through rigorous tests including clarity, motion capture, low-light performance, and daytime visibility. The Vio emerges as the clear winner with excellent image sharpness, but the video suggests the Red Tiger and Cool Crazy as good contenders too. The host emphasizes the importance of verifying features personally due to conflicting product info.
Highlights
The Vio dash cam wins overall with top-notch image clarity. 🏆
Red Tiger offers great value with excellent brightness handling. 🌟
Cool Crazy impresses with its consistency across all tests! 🔄
Cheaper models like the V300 offer decent performance but struggle in low light. 🌙
Nighttime tests reveal significant differences in image quality among brands. 🌌
Despite high price, not all models deliver solid performance—do your research! 🔍
Different dash cams excel in different areas: motion capture, night vision, or clarity. 🔍
Always verify product specifications personally; marketing claims can be misleading. 🤔
The Vio dash cam shines the brightest in this intense showdown! 🏆
Having both front and rear cameras might enhance your driving security setup. 🚗💡
Every video from Project Farm is viewer suggested, inviting more interaction in the comment section! 💬
Overview
Project Farm sets out to uncover the truth about dash cam performance and whether price tags truly justify quality. Among the myriad of brands tested, from Vio and Red Tiger to Cool Crazy and Eiger, each device was put through its paces in a slew of challenges ranging from image clarity to low-light performance.🐒
Throughout the showdown, the Vio dash cam stood out as the frontrunner, consistently delivering the sharpest images and best performance overall. However, the Red Tiger and Cool Crazy models were close runners-up, shining in areas such as light exposure and motion capture, respectively. 🌈
Ultimately, not all dash cams are equal, and this video encourages viewers to look beyond marketing claims, emphasizing the need for personal verification of product specifications. With valuable insights into various models, this video serves as a helpful guide for anyone in the market for a dash cam. 🚦
Chapters
00:00 - 00:30: Dash Cam Quality Overview The chapter discusses the importance of camera quality in dash cams. It explores the difference between lower-priced dash cams, like a $30 model, and higher-priced options like a $130 model, questioning whether the less expensive option can match the more costly one. The chapter outlines three specific tests to evaluate dash cam performance: license plate readability, image capture quality while moving, and night vision capability. One of the cameras being tested is the v300, priced at $22, which claims to offer unmatched clarity with a 1296p HD resolution.
00:30 - 01:00: V300 Dash Cam Features The V300 Dash Cam is described as offering superior night vision, built-in Wi-Fi, and control through an exclusive Vcar app. However, it must be used with a memory card, and it lacks a display, making setting the camera's direction challenging without the app. In a performance test facing west into a sunset, the camera's visual clarity is noted to be grainy at a distance of 75 ft and considerably clearer at 10 ft. The V300 is manufactured in China.
01:00 - 01:30: Aase Dash Cam Performance The chapter focuses on the performance of the Aase Dash Cam, specifically its ability to read license plates, which becomes challenging at a distance of 15 feet. It mentions the cost, model name, and features such as a 24-hour parking mode and support for an SD card up to 128 GB. The chapter also compares the V300 and Air Phase models, noting that although the Air Phase captures more light, its video footage is grainier.
01:30 - 02:00: Miden S7 Dash Cam Features Both the V300 and an unspecified dash camera have difficulty capturing clear license plate details at varying distances: 10 ft (somewhat difficult), 15 ft (grainy), and 20 ft (unreadable).
02:00 - 02:30: Eiger S60 Dash Cam Review The chapter provides a review of the Eiger S60 Dash Cam, evaluating its performance and features. It mentions the underexposed issues with video quality, specifically noting graininess in low light conditions. The review states that the camera struggles to capture license plates clearly beyond 10 to 15 feet. Priced at $45, the Eiger S60 boasts a 2560p resolution with a 2-in IPS screen. It includes a 32 GB SD card and can support up to 256 GB. The camera, manufactured in China, comes with WDR night vision capabilities. There's a comparison in light capture where 'the m' is on the left and 'Eiger' is on the right, suggesting a comparison was made in performance.
02:30 - 03:00: Ovan K600 Dash Cam Analysis The chapter provides an analysis of the Ovan K600 Dash Cam, particularly focusing on the camera quality and performance.
03:00 - 03:30: Cool Crazy Brand Evaluation In this chapter titled 'Cool Crazy Brand Evaluation,' the focus is on evaluating the performance and features of the Overman dash cam compared to the Eiger. The Overman is praised for offering the right amount of light and the sharpest image, making it easy to read license plates from distances of 10 ft to 20 ft, outperforming previous brands twice the distance at a price of $90. The Overman is also noted for its advanced features including 4K Ultra clear resolution, 5G Wi-Fi, GPS tracking, and is a front and rear dash cam offering ultra-high definition 2160p with night vision capabilities.
03:30 - 04:00: Red Tiger Brand Features The chapter "Red Tiger Brand Features" provides an overview of the dash cam's capabilities and specifications. It highlights the performance of the camera, noting that the license plates are easily readable at distances of 10 to 15 feet, and still visible though grainy at 25 feet but becoming difficult to read at 30 feet. Priced at $100 with a discount coupon, the Red Tiger brand is emphasized as a highly popular choice, with more than 10,000 units sold monthly. The dash cam includes both forward and rear-facing cameras.
04:00 - 05:00: RVE R2 Dash Cam Review This chapter provides a review of the RVE R2 Dash Cam, highlighting its features such as 4K resolution, built-in Wi-Fi, GPS, a 3.16-inch screen, and night vision. It includes a comparison between two cameras, Cool Crazy and Red Tiger, assessing their performance in different lighting conditions. It is noted that while both perform well, the Red Tiger's brightness and readability of license plates are superior at shorter distances like 10-15 feet, although the quality declines at 20-25 feet where the graininess of the image becomes noticeable.
05:00 - 05:30: Wolfbox i07 Features Evaluation The chapter evaluates the features of the Wolfbox i07, comparing its $100 price to similar products like the Red Tiger RVE R2. It highlights claims that the i07 includes a Starvis 2 sensor, a 128 GB SD card, and boasts download speeds of 20 megabits per second. Additional claims include full 4K capability, a 1080p rear camera, and exceptional image quality with vivid colors and sharp details in challenging lighting. It also discusses a GPS feature, as well as referencing the Rovar 2 in the context of manufacturing.
05:30 - 06:00: Vio Brand Analysis The chapter 'Vio Brand Analysis' discusses a comparative evaluation of camera performance between two models: China the Red Tiger and Rove. At various distances, each camera's ability to produce clear images is assessed. At 75 feet, Rove offers a sharper image with easily readable signs and license plates at 10 to 15 feet. However, both models begin to show graininess at 20 feet, with images becoming increasingly unclear by 30 feet. The chapter also mentions a product, the wolfbox i07, a three-channel dash cam priced at $114 with a coupon. This device features a forward-facing 4k camera and two additional cameras, emphasizing its value proposition.
06:00 - 06:30: Provo Brand Review The chapter details a review of the Provo brand, specifically focusing on its camera specifications. The cameras are 1080p and come with a 32 GB SD card. They feature infrared (IR) night vision and a 24-hour parking mode, employing six infrared night vision LED lights with advanced Starvest technology. There is a comparison between two models, the Rove and the Wolf Box, noting that while the Wolf Box is made in China and appears underexposed due to the sunset, it performs comparably to the Rove. The clarity of the cameras, particularly in capturing license plates at various distances, is highlighted, with both models maintaining sharpness from 10 to 25 feet.
06:30 - 07:00: Vio vs Miden Comparison The chapter titled 'Vio vs Miden Comparison' discusses a comparison between two dash cam brands, Vio and Miden. The Vio brand is priced at $114 and boasts features such as a 1440p camera recording at 60 frames per second. It is specifically designed for use as a front dash cam and includes a 5 megapixel Starvis sensor, 140-degree wide angle lens, GPS, and buffered parking mode. The product is manufactured in China. During a test, the Vio dash cam, when facing the sunset, is noted for its excellent exposure level and superior image sharpness.
07:00 - 07:30: Dash Cam Road Sign Test This chapter discusses the performance of a dash cam, specifically its ability to capture and display images of road signs and license plates at various distances. At 10 to 15 feet, the license plate visibility is very clear, and at 20 feet, both cameras maintain sharpness, although the VFO camera performs slightly better. The VFO's superiority continues at 25 feet, with optimal readability at 30 feet. The chapter also mentions the dash cam's features, such as a 360° view, 4-channel recording, built-in GPS, Wi-Fi, and night vision, along with a 128 GB SD card, all priced at $120 with a coupon.
07:30 - 08:30: Intersection and Sunlight Performance In the 'Intersection and Sunlight Performance' chapter, a comparative analysis is made between different devices, where it is mentioned that the 'vfo' outperforms 'a proo' in terms of sharpness and exposure. The 'vfo' allows for easier license plate readability at distances of 75 ft and 10 ft, whereas the 'a proo' appears quite grainy and underexposed. The comparison extends to different distances, consistently showing a performance advantage for the 'vfo', particularly in conditions facing into the sunlight.
08:30 - 09:30: Night Vision Test The chapter discusses a night vision test comparing different dash cams: the VFO, Red Tiger Rove, and Wolf Box. At a distance of 30 feet, the VFO performed the best, while the other two tied for second at 25 feet. Assessments included light exposure facing into the sun, where the Red Tiger Rove and VFO scored top ratings. The chapter also examines the dash cams' ability to capture road sign names while driving past at 35 mph but indicates that zooming is necessary to read them clearly.
09:30 - 11:00: Light Box Sign Test In this chapter titled 'Light Box Sign Test,' there is a comparison between different cameras and their ability to capture and display readable signs. The Airace camera performed slightly better than the V300, with both signs being readable, though the Airace provided clearer images of the signs and background. The chapter notes a significant difference in clarity between the Airace and the Miden, with the Airace offering a much sharper image. The chapter ends with a note on the Eiger camera, which struggled, leaving one of the signs unreadable.
11:00 - 12:00: Conclusion and Recommendations The chapter analyzes the video quality performance of three camera models: Eiger, Overman, and Cool Crazy, all claiming to offer 4K video quality.
The Truth About Dash Cams! Transcription
00:00 - 00:30 a dash cam is only as good as the quality of the camera some of these claim to have 4K and others 1080p so the question is is that $30 dash cam just as good as a one that cost 130 well let's find out and the first test we'll see which dash cams do the best job at reading license plates then we'll see which ones do the best job of capturing images while moving finally we'll see which dash cams are for the best night vision the least expensive camera will be testing at a price of $22 is this v300 they claim that this camera has unmatched Clarity with a 1296p HD resolution it does not come with the
00:30 - 01:00 memory card they claim it offers Superior night vision built-in Wi-Fi an exclusive vcar app to effortlessly control your Wi-Fi front dash cam please insert a memory card and the v300 is made in China the v300 does not have a display so unless you're using the mobile app setting up the camera to be pointed in the right direction is a bit of a guessing game in the first test let's give over how the dash cams perform facing west into the sunset the signs indicate the distance from the test vehicle in the farthest is 75 ft away and looks pretty grainy at 10 ft in front of the test vehicle it's pretty
01:00 - 01:30 challenging to read the license plate at only 15 ft I can no longer read the license plate at a price of $30 is this aase brand M Clean Wi-Fi fhd 1080p it offers a 24-hour parking mode supports up to 128 GB SD card up to 30 frames per second please inser the FD please inser the FD and air phase is made in China the v300 is on the left and the air phase is on the right and the air phase is capturing more light however the video footage is even more grainy than
01:30 - 02:00 the less expensive v300 and 10 ft out the license plate is somewhat difficult to read for both dash cameras at 15 ft the license plate is pretty grainy for both cameras I can no longer read the license plate at 20 ft at a price of $40 is this miden S7 the claim it offers 2.5k for the front Cam and 1080p for the rear it offers a front and rear camera it has a large 3.2in full HD screen and the miden S7 is made in China and the air phase is on the left and the miden is on the right pointed into the sunset the mid looks way too dark or
02:00 - 02:30 underexposed and the mid looks just as grainy as the air phase for a license plate at 10 and 15 ft from the test vehicle I can no longer read the license plate at 20 ft at a price of $45 is this Eiger S60 the claim it has a 2560p mini car camera 2-in IPS screen it comes with a 32 GB SD card wdr night vision it supports up to a 256 GB card and the S60 is made in China the m is on the left and eager is on the right and the amount of light with the eager seems is about
02:30 - 03:00 right however both cameras seem pretty grainy at 75 ft both cameras are performing about the same at capturing the license plate at 10 ft and the license plate is pretty grainy at 15 ft at a price of $65 is this ovan k600 it's a dual Channel dash camera the claim the camera is 4K Ultra clear it's also supposed to offer 5G Wi-Fi it includes GPS tracking and the oved is made in China the screen size is 3.59 in it comes with a 32 GB SD card the Eiger is on the left and the openin is on the the
03:00 - 03:30 right and the Overman seems to be offering the right amount of light definitely better than the Eiger and the Overman is definitely offering the sharpest image yet with the Overman it's pretty easy to read the license plate at 10 ft away still looking good at 15 ft becoming a little more difficult at 20 ft but twice the distance as the previous brands at a price of $90 is this cool crazy brand the claim it offers 4K Ultra clear 5G Wi-Fi it also offers GPS tracking it's a front and rear dash cam the clet offers ultra high definition 2160p night vision the CL it helps you read the numbers on license
03:30 - 04:00 plates the OV in is on the left and the cool crazy is on the right and the cool crazy seems unbothered by the sunlight and the exposure level seems to be the best yet and the license plate is pretty easy to read at 10 and 15 ft and the cool crazy is definitely the best yet at 20 ft and the license plate is pretty grainy at 25 ft but still readable and it's too grainy for me to read at 30 ft with a coupon at a price of $100 is this red tiger brand this is a very popular dash cam with over 10,000 sold each month it includes both the forward and rear-facing cameras the front camera
04:00 - 04:30 claims to be full 4K it comes with a 32 GB SD card it has built-in Wi-Fi GPS it also has a 3.16 in screen it also offers night vision and red tiger is made in China cool crazy is on the left and the red tiger is on the right facing into the sunset both cameras are doing a pretty good job but the brightness level of the red tiger looks a little bit better and the license plate is very easy to read at 10 and 15 ft the cool crazy and the red tiger are now tied for the best yet at 20 ft and the license plate is pretty grainy for both cameras at 20 5 ft but still readable and it's
04:30 - 05:00 just too grainy for me to read the license plate from 30 ft away also at a price of $100 the same price as a red tiger is this RVE R2 they claim that it has a starvis 2 sensor it even comes with 128 GB SD card they claim they have the fastest download speed of 20 megabits per second the claim it offers full 4K the claim the rear camera is 1080p the claim it offers exceptional image quality and Vivid colors and sharp details even in challenging lighting conditions we're going to test that it even offers GPS any rovar 2 is made in
05:00 - 05:30 China the red tiger is on the left and the Rove is on the right and the Rove seems to offer the sharpest image yet and the sign at 75 F feet distance is pretty clear and the license plate is very easy to read at 10 and 15 ft the red tiger and the Rove are still doing well at 20 ft and the license plate is pretty grainy for both cameras at 25 ft but still readable and it's too grainy for me to read at 30 ft at a price of $114 with the coupon is this wolfbox i07 it's a three-channel dash cam with three different cameras the forward facing camera is full 4K and the two additional
05:30 - 06:00 cameras are 1080p it comes with a 32 GB SD card IR night vision and 24-hour parking mode it's supposed to have six infrared night vision LED lights with advanced starvest technology and a wolf box is made in China R is on the left and a wolf box is on the right and the light from the sunset is causing the wolf box to appear underexposed however the 75- Ft marker seems almost as sharp as the Rove and the license plate is very clear at 10 and 15 ft both cameras are still fairly sharp at 20 ft and the license plate is pretty great at 25 ft
06:00 - 06:30 and two grainy to read at 30 at a price of $114 is this Vio brand the claim it has a 1440p camera and 60 frames per second unlike most of the other brands it's only designed for front dash cam they claim it has a 5 megapixel starvis sensor 140° wi angle it includes GPS and a buffered parking mode and a vifo brand is made in China and the Wolf box is on the left and the vfo is on the right even facing into the sunset the exposure lever with the vifo seems about perfect and a vifo definitely seems to have the sharpest image yet and the sharpness of
06:30 - 07:00 the sign at 75 ft is looking great and the license plate is very clear at 10 and 15 ft and both cameras are still fairly sharp at 20 ft but the vfo looks better and the vfo is definitely doing better at 25 ft and I can read the vfo at 30 ft the best yet at a price of $120 with a coupon is this Provo brand they claim it's a 360° 4 channel dash cam built-in GPS Wi-Fi and night vision it even comes with 128 GB SD card they claim all four cameras can record at 1080p [Applause]
07:00 - 07:30 and a proo is made in China the vfo is on the left and a proo is on the right and a proo seems underexposed and quite a bit less sharp than the vifo and the sign is pretty grainy at 75 ft the license plate is pretty easy to read at 10 ft but the brao looks pretty grainy at 15 unfortunately I can't read the license plate with pero at 20 ft comparing the first place finisher the vfo against the miden you can see a huge difference in sharpness and exposure and there's also a huge difference in sharpness at 10 and 15 ft with a huge Advantage going to the Vio like license plate readability facing into the sunset
07:30 - 08:00 is somewhat subjective but the vfo came out on top at 30 ft the cool crazy red tiger Rove and wolf box tied for second place at 25 ft assessing light exposure facing into the sun is highly subjective but the red tiger Rove and vifo received the best possible rating of one in the next test let's see how the dash cams perform at capturing the name of the road sign while driving past it at 35 mph at 30 frames per second I'm unable to read the road sign while driving past it with the v300 stopping the video footage and then zooming in on the signs
08:00 - 08:30 I can only read one of the two signs and the airace performed a little bit better than the v300 and both signs are readable the v300 is on the left and the air phase is on the right and the air phase definitely did a better job with the signs and the trees in the background are not as grainy in case you're wondering there's nothing on the camera lenss of the miden it really does look this bad and the air phas is on the left and the miden is on the right and the air phase definitely offers a Sharper Image this time the trees in the background also look sharper with the air face and the Eiger also struggled on this test only one of the two signs is readable the miden is on the left and
08:30 - 09:00 the Eiger is on the right and the miden definitely performed better this time and the Overman claims to offer 4K video but both road signs appear pretty grainy as well as the trees in the background e yuger is on the left and the Overman is on the right even though the image is pretty grainy the Overman definitely perform better and the cool crazy claims to offer 4K video and the cool crazy is doing by far the best job yet Overman is on the left and the cool crazy is on the right and the cool crazy offers a much sharper image of both signs as well as the trees in the background and the red tiger also CL claims to offer 4K video
09:00 - 09:30 and the red tiger is also performing well and offering a crisp image of both signs and the trees in the background cool crazy is on the left and the red tiger is on the right both cameras are doing a great job but the cool crazy seems a little bit sharper just like the red tiger the roof claims to deliver 4K video and the sharpness of the signs looks pretty good red tiger is on the left and the RO is on the right and both cameras seem to be performing about the same and the Wolf box claims to offer 4K video and seems to be offering just as much sharpness as a cool crazy the RO is on the left and the Wolf box is on the
09:30 - 10:00 right and the Wolf box seems to be offering a sharper image of the signs and the vfo claims to deliver 1440p video and the vfo seems to be performing just about as good as some of the 4K cameras wolfbox is on the left and the vifo is on the right and the wolfbox seems to get the win this time with a little bit Sharper Image compared to the vifo and the proo claims to offer 1080P and the road signs just don't look nearly as sharp compared to the previous five Brands the vifo is on the left and the proo is on the right and a vfo definitely offers a much sharper image of both signs as well as the trees in the background and the v300 is on the
10:00 - 10:30 left and the Wolf box is on the right and there's a huge difference between the two brands with the wolf box offering a very sharp image assessing performance is highly subjective but the cool crazy in the wolf box did the best job at providing a sharp image while moving at approximately 35 mph the red tiger Rove and vifo also perform well with a rating of two pulling up to an intersection facing into the sunset will really put these cameras to the test unfortunately the v300 is unable to provide a clear image of the road signs just above and below the stop sign however the highway sign across the
10:30 - 11:00 street is grainy but sharp enough to read and the a phase once again is performing better than the v300 one of the two signs is pretty easy to read the v300 is on the left and the air phase is on the right and the air phase is definitely performing a lot better on this test and the sunset is causing a lot of problems for the miden unfortunately the road signs are unreadable the air phase is on the left and the miden is on the right and the air phase definitely perform quite a bit better just like the miden the eager is really struggling with the road signs the miden is on the left and eager is on the right unfortunately both cameras
11:00 - 11:30 really struggled on this test and I'm unable to read the road signs unfortunately the sunlight from the sunset is also causing issues for the ovam however one of the two signs is barely readable the eager is on the left and the Overman is on the right and the Overman is definitely performing better and the cool crazy continues to perform very well and the road sign is pretty easy to read even the highway sign across the road looks pretty sharp Overman is on the left and the cool crazy is on the right and there's a huge difference between the brands and it's a clear Advantage for the cool crazy and red tiger continues to perform with and both signs look pretty sharp even with
11:30 - 12:00 some sun reflection on the sign even the road sign across the street is sharp enough to read cool crazy is on the left and the ovan is on the right and both Brands performed about the same with the straight signs but the red tiger did provide a sharper image of the yellow sign and the light from the sunset is really challenging the Rove I can read the highway sign across the street but not the street signs just above the stop sign and the red tiger is on the left and the Rove is on the right and the red tiger definitely performed quite a bit better and the Wolf box is also struggling with the light from the sunset however both s are readable and
12:00 - 12:30 the highway sign across the street is also readable the RO is on the left and the Wolf box is on the right and the Wolf box definitely performed better on this test and the Vio just might be performing the best yet with a pretty sharp image of the road sign across the street as well as the street signs and the Wolf box is on the left and the vfo is on the right and the Vio is definitely performing better even the text on the yellow sign looks pretty sharp unfortunately things are not going well for the prao and the street signs are just not readable and the highway sign across the street is also not readable the vifo is on the left and the proo is on the right and once again the
12:30 - 13:00 vifo is outperforming the proo assessing performance is highly subjective but the red tiger and the vifo performed the best with a rating of 1.5 the cool crazy in the wolf box also performed well with a rating of two night vision performance will definitely put these cameras to the test approaching the stop sign I stopped the vehicle approximately 50 ft away and I couldn't read the Green Street sign with the v300 I then moved ahead and then stopped five additional times in increments of around 8 to 10 ft at the closest stopping point I can barely read the street sign with the v300 overall
13:00 - 13:30 the air phas looks sharper than the v300 at the fifth stopping point I'm able to read the street sign but it's very grainy at the sixth stopping point it's a little bit easier to read but still very grainy and the mid really struggle with daytime and sunset performance but it's performing a little bit better at night just like the a phase the sign is pretty hard to read at the fifth stopping point however at the sixth stopping point the street sign is the easiest to read yet and the eager also struggled quite a bit with daytime performance and it's not looking good for the nighttime performance either unfortunately the street sign is unreadable at at each and every stopping
13:30 - 14:00 point and the Overman performed a little bit better than the previous brands at reading the license plate but really struggled with most of the other test and the Overman is struggling to read the street sign but is finally readable at the sixth and final stopping point and the cool crazy has outperformed all the previous brands in every test so far and the cool crazy is outperforming the previous Brands once again the reflective green sign is pretty readable at the fifth stop and very easy to read on a six stop and the red Tigers perform very well throughout the Showdown and better than the cool crazy in some categories and red tiger is doing the best so far with the sign barely
14:00 - 14:30 readable on the four stop which is the best yet the fifth stopping point is looking pretty sharp and the six stopping point looks the best yet and the RO is performed fairly well throughout the Showdown but not quite as well as a cool crazy on average and the RO is finally capturing a pretty sharp image on the fifth stopping point at the six stopping point is still looking pretty good and the Wolf box is another one of the best performing dash cameras in The Showdown so far and the sign is barely readable on the four stopping point the street sign is pretty easy to read on a fifth stopping point and very easy to read on a final stopping point and the V has outperformed most of the
14:30 - 15:00 other cameras and most of the testing so far and the vfo moves into the lead at the third stopping point the image is very grainy but the best so far the vfo just produced the best image yet on the fourth stopping point and the fifth and six stopping points look nice and sharp with only a 1080p main camera the proo is at a pretty big disadvantage compared to the previous five Brands and the proo is finally gaining a clear image of the street sign on the fifth stopping point and a six stopping point is looking even better assessing performance is highly subjective but the vifo came at on top with the best best possible rating of
15:00 - 15:30 one the red tiger and the Wolf box tied for second place with a finish of 1.5 and the finally and most challenging test yet let's see which dash cam does the best job of providing a clear image of a light box sign with a digital display and a v300 is really struggling and cannot read the name on the sign or the gas price on the digital display and the a phase cost $8 more than the v300 and it's performing about 99 Cents better unfortunately the a phase is overwhelmed by all the light from the sign in the digital display I promise some of the other Dash cabs are going to perform a lot better and $40 miden has trailed the $22 v300 in serval test and
15:30 - 16:00 is struggling on this test as well unfortunately the miden is unable to read the sign or the fuel prices and the eer has struggled the most of all the dash cam in the review so far but it's performing marginally better with the lighted sign the digital display is very blurry but marginally better than the first three brands and theoa men has struggled quite a bit throughout the Showdown but it's performing better on this test in the first four Brands I'm unable to read the price of gasoline but diesel appears to cost $3.3 per gallon and a cool is pretty much ran circles around the first five
16:00 - 16:30 Brands throughout the entire Showdown and the cool crazy is by far the best yet in the lighted box and the digital display are very easy to read and the red tiger is performed better than the cool crazy in most categories but not this one unfortunately the lighted box is unreadable and the digital display is also very difficult to read and the RO has performed better than average in most categories and is doing a great job on this test while not quite as sharp as a cool crazy the lighted box and the digital display are readable with the Rove and the Wolf box is also performed better than average in most categories but it's is struggling on this test
16:30 - 17:00 unfortunately the lighted box is unreadable and the digital display is marginally readable at best and the vfos has outperform the competition in most categories throughout the Showdown even from a couple hundred feet away the vifo is providing a pretty readable image of the digital display and the gas station brand up Clos the vifo is by far the best yet very impressive and Theo is at a huge disadvantage at 1080P and it continues to struggle on this test unfortunately the lighted box is unreadable and the digital display is pretty difficult to read assessing performance is highly subed but the fireo received the best possible rating
17:00 - 17:30 of one cool crazy performed almost as well with the rating of 1.5 and Ro finished in third place with a rating of two to help viewers make a more informed buying decision I've attempted to put together an accurate list of dash cam features and specifications however there was a lot of conflicting information when comparing the manufacturer's information with the marketing information so please double check the information that I provided just to make sure the information that I provided is correct I decided not to test the rear facing camera since none of them offer 4K and 1080p just doesn't offer an acceptable performance in my
17:30 - 18:00 opinion so which dash cam is the best I've converted ra performance into a first to 11th Place ranking and if VL pretty much ran circles around the competition and had an average finish of 1.3 it only offers a forward- facing camera but if it were me I'd buy a second camera for the rear window if a second camera is desired the red tiger is also a terrific camera and had an average finish at 2.2 the cool crazy finish in third place with an average finish at 2.7 if I can only choose one dash cam I'd definitely go with the vifo however I'd also buy the red tiger in the cool crazy if the price was right I
18:00 - 18:30 didn't think we'd see such a huge difference in performance among the brands please check out the video description if you'd like to see more details about each of the products all the videos of this channel including this one are viewers suggested you if you have a video idea I hope you'll take time to leave a comment thanks so much for watching please take care and look forward to next time