India Vs Pakistan | Barkha's Questions On Terrorism Rattle Ex Pakistani FM On Piers Morgan's Show

Summary

In a heated exchange on Piers Morgan's show, Barkha Dutt questioned former Pakistani foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar, about Pakistan's stance on terrorism. Dutt probed Khar on whether Pakistan recognizes groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed as terrorist organizations, highlighting their international proscription and activities in India. Khar responded by questioning India's intentions and accused it of exploiting terrorism narratives to garner global sympathy, while asserting Pakistan's proactive steps against terrorism. This dialogue underscores the ongoing tensions and differing perspectives between the two nations on terrorism and diplomacy.

Highlights

• Barkha Dutt doesn't mince words as she questions Pakistan's stance on terror groups! 🎯
• Former Pakistani FM hesitant to fully acknowledge banned groups' terrorist status. 🤔
• Accusations fly as Khar flips the script, calling out India's strategies! 💥
• The show spotlights long-standing Indo-Pak hostilities and blame games. ⚔️
• Pakistan's claim of corrective actions on terrorism is put under the spotlight! 🌟

Key Takeaways

• Barkha Dutt confronts Hina Rabbani Khar on Pakistan's terrorism policies. 🎤
• Questions revolve around groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed. ❓
• Khar accuses India of using terrorism narratives strategically. 🇮🇳
• Dialogue showcases ongoing India-Pakistan tensions over terrorism. 🔥
• Pakistan's efforts in combating terrorism are highlighted. 🇵🇰

Overview

On a recent episode of Piers Morgan's show, the air was electric as veteran journalist Barkha Dutt took on Hina Rabbani Khar, Pakistan's former foreign minister. Dutt's questioning zeroed in on some sensitive topics—specifically, Pakistan's ambiguous stance on terror groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, which are notorious for their activities across the border in India. With the IMF bailout and economic comparisons in the fore, the stage was set for intense debate!

As the discussion heated up, Khar was put in a tough spot. Barkha Dutt asked direct, sharp questions about whether Pakistan acknowledges these groups as terrorists and why they've been able to operate without hindrance in Pakistan. In response, Khar chose a defensive approach, suggesting that India uses the narrative of terrorism to its advantage, rather than giving straight answers to Dutt's queries. The back-and-forth revealed deeper diplomatic tensions!

This fiery exchange between Dutt and Khar underscores the lingering discord between India and Pakistan. While Dutt pushed for clarity and accountability regarding terrorism, Khar's rebuttals hinted at mistrust and shifting responsibilities. The episode reflects the ongoing complex dance of regional politics, marked by historical grievances and contrasting national stories. Stay tuned—this conversation is far from over!

Chapters

• 00:00 - 00:30: Opening Remarks and Initial Questions The chapter titled 'Opening Remarks and Initial Questions' begins with Hina's statement emphasizing that Pakistan does not seek equivalence or parallels with India, recognizing their different global economic standings. It highlights the recent financial bailout of Pakistan by the IMF in contrast to India's economic growth projection to become the fourth largest economy. The remarks conclude with India's preference to distance itself from Pakistan, followed by two unnamed questions posed at the end of the transcript.
• 00:30 - 01:00: Questions on Terrorism Groups and Their Activities The chapter discusses questions posed to Hin Ravani Khar regarding the recognition of Lashkar-e-Taiba as a terrorist group by the US and UK. It further delves into the group's responsibility for the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks that resulted in the death of six Americans. The chapter raises a question about why Lashkar-e-Taiba, acknowledged as a terror group, supposedly hasn't conducted any attacks in Pakistan but has targeted India.
• 01:00 - 01:30: Question on Osama bin Laden and Subsequent Remarks The chapter delves into a question posed to Hin Rubani Khar regarding her perception of the United States' operation in Abbottabad, which led to the killing of Osama bin Laden. It discusses whether she perceives this action as an act of war against Pakistan. Additionally, it raises a parallel with India's actions against internationally recognized terror groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, questioning whether such actions should be a concern for Pakistan or viewed with gratitude.
• 01:30 - 02:00: Demand for Acknowledgement on Terror Groups In this chapter titled 'Demand for Acknowledgement on Terror Groups,' the dialogue focuses on India's insistence on acknowledging Lashkar and Jes as terrorist groups. The conversation appears to involve a debate or questioning session, pressing for a response on whether these groups are considered terrorists and whether they are permitted to operate freely in Pakistan. The chapter highlights a tension-filled exchange where a participant named Hina is questioned repeatedly on her stance regarding the classification of these groups as terrorists and her acceptance of such a designation.
• 02:00 - 02:30: Continuation of Terror Group Discussion The chapter continues the discussion on a terror group's activities, with a focus on their operation in Pakistan. A speaker, Hina, is challenged with direct questions regarding the acknowledgment of the group as terrorists and their operations. Hina firmly rejects the notion that Pakistan is allowing them to operate with impunity and contrasts Pakistan's efforts to correct wrongs with the narrative surrounding India's actions. The discussion also touches on narrative shaping and the construction of stories about regional politics. The conversation seems to emphasize the political dynamics between Pakistan and India regarding terrorism and accountability.
• 02:30 - 03:00: Attempt to Shift Narrative by Hina This chapter discusses the use of terrorism as a tool by a country to gain international sympathy and operate outside international laws. The narrative seems to delve into the strategic attempts to influence global perceptions and the implications on international diplomacy.

India Vs Pakistan | Barkha's Questions On Terrorism Rattle Ex Pakistani FM On Piers Morgan's Show Transcription

• 00:00 - 00:30 a statement and a question. Hina said that Pakistan does not seek any equivalence with India, any parallels with India. There can be none. Pakistan just got bailed out by the IMF with a loan for $1 billion. The IMF projects India to be the fourth largest economy in the world. India would love to ignore Pakistan if we could. India seeks no hibernation with Pakistan either. My question I have two questions
• 00:30 - 01:00 for Hin Ravani Khar. One is does she acknowledge the Lashkari Taiba recognized to be a terrorist group by the United States and the United Kingdom recognized to be the group responsible for the Mumbai terror attacks of 2611 in which six Americans died? Does she recognize both these groups to be terror groups? And if she does, can she explain why they have never conducted a single terror strike within Pakistan and have only conducted terror strikes in India?
• 01:00 - 01:30 My second question to Hin Rubani Khar is what did she feel about the Americans coming in and taking out Osama bin Laden from Aabad where he was given a safe space to stay. If she did not think the Americans conducted an act of war against Pakistan, then she should not think that the Indians tracking the bases of the Lashkarita and the Jes Muhammad prescribed internationally recognized terror groups should be considered something that Pakistan has to worry about. Pakistan should thank
• 01:30 - 02:00 India. We helped you demolish terror groups. All right, let me get the response then. Ha, your response. But are the Lashkar and Jes terrorist groups? She didn't answer the question. Does she acknowledge that the Lashkar and the Jes are terrorist groups that have freedom to function in Pakistan? Please answer the question. Let me question that point. I will not stoop myself. Are they terrorists? Any such question. Are they terrorists? Well, Hina, do you do you accept they are a terrorist group? What you want to look
• 02:00 - 02:30 at? Well, Hina, let me ask the question. I think you need to bring Hina, let me ask the question. Hina, do you accept that they are a terrorist group? And do you accept that they have been operating with impunity in Pakistan? I mean that that's I think your last comment I would absolutely reject. I think Pakistan is a country which is trying to correct the wrongs. India is a country which is trying to do the wrongs. There's a vast difference. You can narrative shape as much as you want and build these lovely stories about you know so I I okay Pier how about me saying that I believe India
• 02:30 - 03:00 is a country which has weaponized terrorism to be able to get the sympathies of the world to work outside of international law to sit down and resolve the listen listen okay hang and